<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceActuaries support Government response to Cooper Review</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2010/12/actuaries-support-government-response-to-cooper-review-on-super-fund-capital-requirements-and-longevity-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2010/12/actuaries-support-government-response-to-cooper-review-on-super-fund-capital-requirements-and-longevity-risk/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Actuaries support Government response to Cooper Review on super fund capital requirements and longevity risk</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2010/12/actuaries-support-government-response-to-cooper-review-on-super-fund-capital-requirements-and-longevity-risk/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2010/12/actuaries-support-government-response-to-cooper-review-on-super-fund-capital-requirements-and-longevity-risk/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actuaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooper Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute of Actuaries of Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=4936</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>The Institute of Actuaries of Australia (the Institute) has today welcomed the Government response to the Cooper Review, in particular for giving the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) prudential standards making power in relation to super funds and support of a risk-based system that will apply to all APRA regulated super funds for holding financial resources against operational risk.</p>
<p>Bozenna Hinton, Institute President, said the Institute supports the concept of an identifiable risk reserve for superannuation funds held separately from member account balances. She said the minimum level for this should be set on a risk assessed basis consistent with other financial services industries.</p>
<p>“We are pleased that the Government will consider a risk based system for all APRA regulated super funds requiring them to hold financial resources against operational risk, as we recommended this in our submissions to the Cooper Review,” Ms Hinton said. “We note that the Government will consult with relevant stakeholders on whether such a system should require resources to be held in the form of trustee capital or an operational risk reserve in the fund.”</p>
<p>The Institute confirms that as part of this process, a Financial Condition Report for accumulation super funds should eventually become compulsory, but in the meantime should be considered best practice. Such a report would allow trustees to stress test a super fund under different market conditions.</p>
<p>Support for idea that super funds consider longevity risk but more work needed The Institute also supports the recommendation that both MySuper and choice super funds be explicitly required to consider longevity and inflation risk. However, Ms Hinton said more concrete measures were needed.</p>
<p>“As a next step, we encourage the Government to remove the roadblocks preventing innovation and product development in the post retirement product market including social security and tax barriers.</p>
<p>Development of new post retirement products will better equip Australians to protect themselves against their own longevity risk,” Ms Hinton said.</p>
<p>The Government has also indicated that while it does not support mandatory retirement forecasts for MySuper products, it will ask the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to continue working on developments in this area.</p>
<p>“The Institute strongly supports the idea of retirement forecasts being provided to super fund members so is disappointed about this outcome. However, we look forward to working with ASIC particularly in relation to the assumptions used for such forecasts and how the results could be presented,” Ms Hinton said.</p>
<p>“Similarly, we look forward to working with APRA and ASIC regarding the publication of superannuation data designed to improve transparency and comparability in relation to net investment performance fees and costs,” Ms Hinton said.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Institute of Actuaries of Australia (the Institute) has today welcomed the Government response to the Cooper Review, in particular for giving the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) prudential standards making power in relation to super funds and support of a risk-based system that will apply to all APRA regulated super funds for holding financial resources against operational risk.</p>
<p>Bozenna Hinton, Institute President, said the Institute supports the concept of an identifiable risk reserve for superannuation funds held separately from member account balances. She said the minimum level for this should be set on a risk assessed basis consistent with other financial services industries.</p>
<p>“We are pleased that the Government will consider a risk based system for all APRA regulated super funds requiring them to hold financial resources against operational risk, as we recommended this in our submissions to the Cooper Review,” Ms Hinton said. “We note that the Government will consult with relevant stakeholders on whether such a system should require resources to be held in the form of trustee capital or an operational risk reserve in the fund.”</p>
<p>The Institute confirms that as part of this process, a Financial Condition Report for accumulation super funds should eventually become compulsory, but in the meantime should be considered best practice. Such a report would allow trustees to stress test a super fund under different market conditions.</p>
<p>Support for idea that super funds consider longevity risk but more work needed The Institute also supports the recommendation that both MySuper and choice super funds be explicitly required to consider longevity and inflation risk. However, Ms Hinton said more concrete measures were needed.</p>
<p>“As a next step, we encourage the Government to remove the roadblocks preventing innovation and product development in the post retirement product market including social security and tax barriers.</p>
<p>Development of new post retirement products will better equip Australians to protect themselves against their own longevity risk,” Ms Hinton said.</p>
<p>The Government has also indicated that while it does not support mandatory retirement forecasts for MySuper products, it will ask the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to continue working on developments in this area.</p>
<p>“The Institute strongly supports the idea of retirement forecasts being provided to super fund members so is disappointed about this outcome. However, we look forward to working with ASIC particularly in relation to the assumptions used for such forecasts and how the results could be presented,” Ms Hinton said.</p>
<p>“Similarly, we look forward to working with APRA and ASIC regarding the publication of superannuation data designed to improve transparency and comparability in relation to net investment performance fees and costs,” Ms Hinton said.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2010/12/actuaries-support-government-response-to-cooper-review-on-super-fund-capital-requirements-and-longevity-risk/">Actuaries support Government response to Cooper Review on super fund capital requirements and longevity risk</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2010/12/actuaries-support-government-response-to-cooper-review-on-super-fund-capital-requirements-and-longevity-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>