<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceBudget: Actuaries disappointed longevity risk ignored again</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 21:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Actuaries disappointed longevity risk ignored again in 2011 Federal Budget</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annuities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fund Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-managed superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=8251</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">The Institute of Actuaries of Australia (the Institute) has today said it was disappointed the pressing issue of longevity risk was largely ignored in the 2011 Federal Budget.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>The Institute has been urging the government to develop longevity risk policies, including removing barriers to the development of a new generation annuities market, to meet the growing challenges of Australia&#8217;s ageing population.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Recognising many retirees superannuation will not meet their retirement needs, Institute chief executive Melinda Howes it was time the government took decisive action on this issue.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“We were pleased the Federal Government followed our recommendation and allowed older Australians to boost their standard of living in retirement by working part-time without jeopardising their pension income. From 1 July, age pensioners will be able to earn up to $250 per fortnight before their pension will be impacted by the means test.”</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Ms Howes said although this positive change was made as part of the Government&#8217;s workplace participation initiatives, the issue of longevity risk continues to be side-lined when a number of solutions are available. These include allowing development of flexible &#8220;new generation&#8221; annuities which protect against the risk of outliving your retirement savings and the market risk of losing superannuation capital in retirement.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“Retirees need access to products that reduce the two major risks they face, market and longevity risk. Innovative annuity products are ideally suited to meet these objectives however a number of legislative impediments are limiting their development,” she said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">In its pre-Budget submission, the Institute urged the government amend the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act Regulation 106 as it is unnecessarily prescriptive and as a result is hampering innovation. The unfavourable treatment of annuities under aged care and Centrelink rules should also be reversed and the tax rules on deferred annuities should be changed so that, if taken out in the drawdown phase, the product is regarded as a pension (rather than a non-pension) for tax purposes.</div>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">The Institute of Actuaries of Australia (the Institute) has today said it was disappointed the pressing issue of longevity risk was largely ignored in the 2011 Federal Budget.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>The Institute has been urging the government to develop longevity risk policies, including removing barriers to the development of a new generation annuities market, to meet the growing challenges of Australia&#8217;s ageing population.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Recognising many retirees superannuation will not meet their retirement needs, Institute chief executive Melinda Howes it was time the government took decisive action on this issue.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“We were pleased the Federal Government followed our recommendation and allowed older Australians to boost their standard of living in retirement by working part-time without jeopardising their pension income. From 1 July, age pensioners will be able to earn up to $250 per fortnight before their pension will be impacted by the means test.”</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Ms Howes said although this positive change was made as part of the Government&#8217;s workplace participation initiatives, the issue of longevity risk continues to be side-lined when a number of solutions are available. These include allowing development of flexible &#8220;new generation&#8221; annuities which protect against the risk of outliving your retirement savings and the market risk of losing superannuation capital in retirement.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“Retirees need access to products that reduce the two major risks they face, market and longevity risk. Innovative annuity products are ideally suited to meet these objectives however a number of legislative impediments are limiting their development,” she said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">In its pre-Budget submission, the Institute urged the government amend the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act Regulation 106 as it is unnecessarily prescriptive and as a result is hampering innovation. The unfavourable treatment of annuities under aged care and Centrelink rules should also be reversed and the tax rules on deferred annuities should be changed so that, if taken out in the drawdown phase, the product is regarded as a pension (rather than a non-pension) for tax purposes.</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/">Actuaries disappointed longevity risk ignored again in 2011 Federal Budget</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>