<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceFPA: Measures to fix excess contributions falls short</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>FPA: Measures to fix excess contributions falls short</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 04:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-managed superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=8307</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>FPA  propose  further  reforms  to  super  contributions  to  secure  Australia’s  long  term  retirement  savings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Last night’s Federal Budget announcement allowing excess superannuation  contributions to be refunded back to the individuals reflects the ongoing  advocacy efforts of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) but represents a  lost opportunity to fix a problem facing many Australians.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“While this  reform is expected to reduce the number of occasions where the concessional  contribution caps are exceeded and individuals penalised, the measure falls well  short of delivering a solution for a very serious problem,” FPA CEO Mark Rantall  said.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
&#8220;We believe the government could have taken advantage of the strong  economic position to embark on a more ambitious tax reform program and whilst  the concessional contributions amendments are welcome, there needs to be a  substantial rethink of how we engage Australians in contributing to a stronger,  long term retirement income position.”<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The FPA has called on the Federal  Government to remove the 46.5 per cent excess contributions tax penalty for  non-concessional contribution and:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Refund excess non-concessional  contributions back to the taxpayer</li>
<li>Provide taxpayer with warning and  impose no monetary penalty if it is taxpayers first break of the  non-concessional cap</li>
<li>Impose a monetary penalty (admin fee) on the  taxpayer if this is the second/third break of the non-concessional  cap</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Nor does the FPA support the introduction of a $500,000 account  balance eligibility threshold for concessional contributions. Rather, the FPA  has called for:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>The concessional contributions cap for people aged 50  and over to at least remain at $50,000 but indexed with inflation</li>
<li>Removal of the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) from the concessional contribution  limit</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
From 1 July 2011, individuals who breach the concessional  contributions cap by up to $10,000 can request that these excess contributions  be refunded to them. This refund will only apply for first time breaches of the  concessional caps. In effect, individuals will be able to take excess  concessional contributions out of their superannuation fund and have it assessed  at their marginal rate of tax, rather than incurring a potentially higher rate  of excess contributions tax. However, what is not clear is whether individuals  who have breached the cap before this measure commences will be  eligible.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The Government plans to complement the other reforms including  the increase in the concessional caps for those over 50 (with superannuation  balances under $500,000) from 1 July 2012; the gradual increase in the SG rate  to 12 per cent; and a new super contribution of up to $500 for low income  earners.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“The FPA looks forward to continuing to work with the Federal  Government and Treasury to ensure we achieve the most equitable outcome for both  the financial planning profession and the retirement savings of all  Australians,” Mr Rantall said.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FPA  propose  further  reforms  to  super  contributions  to  secure  Australia’s  long  term  retirement  savings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Last night’s Federal Budget announcement allowing excess superannuation  contributions to be refunded back to the individuals reflects the ongoing  advocacy efforts of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) but represents a  lost opportunity to fix a problem facing many Australians.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“While this  reform is expected to reduce the number of occasions where the concessional  contribution caps are exceeded and individuals penalised, the measure falls well  short of delivering a solution for a very serious problem,” FPA CEO Mark Rantall  said.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
&#8220;We believe the government could have taken advantage of the strong  economic position to embark on a more ambitious tax reform program and whilst  the concessional contributions amendments are welcome, there needs to be a  substantial rethink of how we engage Australians in contributing to a stronger,  long term retirement income position.”<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The FPA has called on the Federal  Government to remove the 46.5 per cent excess contributions tax penalty for  non-concessional contribution and:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Refund excess non-concessional  contributions back to the taxpayer</li>
<li>Provide taxpayer with warning and  impose no monetary penalty if it is taxpayers first break of the  non-concessional cap</li>
<li>Impose a monetary penalty (admin fee) on the  taxpayer if this is the second/third break of the non-concessional  cap</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Nor does the FPA support the introduction of a $500,000 account  balance eligibility threshold for concessional contributions. Rather, the FPA  has called for:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>The concessional contributions cap for people aged 50  and over to at least remain at $50,000 but indexed with inflation</li>
<li>Removal of the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) from the concessional contribution  limit</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
From 1 July 2011, individuals who breach the concessional  contributions cap by up to $10,000 can request that these excess contributions  be refunded to them. This refund will only apply for first time breaches of the  concessional caps. In effect, individuals will be able to take excess  concessional contributions out of their superannuation fund and have it assessed  at their marginal rate of tax, rather than incurring a potentially higher rate  of excess contributions tax. However, what is not clear is whether individuals  who have breached the cap before this measure commences will be  eligible.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The Government plans to complement the other reforms including  the increase in the concessional caps for those over 50 (with superannuation  balances under $500,000) from 1 July 2012; the gradual increase in the SG rate  to 12 per cent; and a new super contribution of up to $500 for low income  earners.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“The FPA looks forward to continuing to work with the Federal  Government and Treasury to ensure we achieve the most equitable outcome for both  the financial planning profession and the retirement savings of all  Australians,” Mr Rantall said.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/">FPA: Measures to fix excess contributions falls short</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>