<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceIndia’s state elections deal blow to economic reform hopes</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/03/india%e2%80%99s-state-elections-deal-blow-to-economic-reform-hopes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/03/india’s-state-elections-deal-blow-to-economic-reform-hopes/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>India’s state elections deal blow to economic reform hopes</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/03/india%e2%80%99s-state-elections-deal-blow-to-economic-reform-hopes/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/03/india%e2%80%99s-state-elections-deal-blow-to-economic-reform-hopes/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Managers Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidelity Worldwide Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=13601</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>Indian stocks rallied in 2009 after general elections gave Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of the Indian National Congress party a more-cohesive coalition with which to accelerate the modernisation of India.</p>
<p>Singh’s alliance has since cracked under corruption scandals. The results of recent state elections will only make it harder for him to unify his political partners and push through the reforms that India’s slowing economy needs.</p>
<p>The results of month-long elections showed that the Congress party performed poorly in three of the five state polls. The most disappointing result was in northern state of Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state that, as home to more than 200 million people, is considered to be the political battleground state. Congress was banking on boosting its holding of 22 seats in the 403-seat assembly to at least 80 seats to enable it to form a coalition at state level with the socialist Samajwadi Party so it could cement this party’s support at federal level.</p>
<p>Even though Congress’ bid for power was headed by Rahul Gandhi of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty that has dominated Indian politics since independence in 1947, the Samajwadi Party won a comfortable majority in the state from the tainted Bahujan Sarnaj Party (whose leader is fond of building statues of herself) – gaining at least 220 of the 403 seats. Congress only won at least 28 seats, to come fourth in a state that sends most MPs to the Lok Sabha, as India’s lower house of parliament is called.</p>
<p>The result follows a bleak 2011 for Congress at a national level and portends poorly for the next general elections in 2014, especially now its hoped-for prime minister Gandhi failed to win over voters. Numerous corruption scandals over the past 12 months or so have scuttled the government’s reform drive as smaller coalition partners have splintered off and thwarted any significant changes.</p>
<p>The most glaring reform defeat was Congress’ announcement last year that India would allow foreign department store owners such as Walmart to set up in India. This decision, which didn’t require the passing of any laws, was overturned within days after Congress’ coalition partners, opposition parties and state governments objected to a move that is seen as threatening the family-run stores prevalent throughout India. Other stalled reforms include attempts to clarify land acquisition, strengthen anti-corruption measures and overhaul insurance and investment management.</p>
<p><strong>Investor verdict</strong><br />
Congress was hoping that a strong performance across the five states would pressure its rebelling federal coalition partners or prompt its outside supporters such as the Samajwadi Party to push on with reforms. Better results may have also improved the morale and determination of Singh’s rattled-looking government.</p>
<p>Even if a Congress-led coalition holds onto power in 2014 (and Congress has ruled India for most of the post-independence era), it’s now more likely to be a far more unwieldy coalition than the one that so excited investors in 2009. The Congress-led coalition that ruled India from 2004 to 2009 was a disjointed coalition that included Communist MPs.</p>
<p>Investors were disappointed with the state election results. “We view the election results as negative for economic reforms and the markets, though a key uncertainty has been lifted,” said Goldman Sachs in a report on the election.  “We think the results will not provide the political space for the government or the confidence to carry through unpopular reforms.”</p>
<p>Congress did win a majority in the northeastern state of Manipur and in the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, but it fizzled in the northern state of Punjab (won by the incumbent alliance of the Shrimoni Akali Dal and Hindu-based Bharatiya Janata Party) and in the western state of Goa (won from Congress by the Bharatiya Janata Party).</p>
<p>Congress has much work to do to spark another rally in shares.</p>
<p> <em>This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”).  Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity Worldwide Investment. This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.  You should consider these matters before acting on the information.  You also should consider the Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for respective Fidelity products before making a decision whether to acquire or hold the product.  The relevant PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading from our website at <a href="http://www.fidelity.com.au/">www.fidelity.com.au</a>. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Details about Fidelity Australia’s provision of financial services to retail clients are set out in our Financial Services Guide, a copy of which can be downloaded from our website at <a href="http://www.fidelity.com.au/">www.fidelity.com.au</a>. © 2012 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity Worldwide Investment and the Fidelity Worldwide Investment logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.</em></p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indian stocks rallied in 2009 after general elections gave Prime Minister Manmohan Singh of the Indian National Congress party a more-cohesive coalition with which to accelerate the modernisation of India.</p>
<p>Singh’s alliance has since cracked under corruption scandals. The results of recent state elections will only make it harder for him to unify his political partners and push through the reforms that India’s slowing economy needs.</p>
<p>The results of month-long elections showed that the Congress party performed poorly in three of the five state polls. The most disappointing result was in northern state of Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state that, as home to more than 200 million people, is considered to be the political battleground state. Congress was banking on boosting its holding of 22 seats in the 403-seat assembly to at least 80 seats to enable it to form a coalition at state level with the socialist Samajwadi Party so it could cement this party’s support at federal level.</p>
<p>Even though Congress’ bid for power was headed by Rahul Gandhi of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty that has dominated Indian politics since independence in 1947, the Samajwadi Party won a comfortable majority in the state from the tainted Bahujan Sarnaj Party (whose leader is fond of building statues of herself) – gaining at least 220 of the 403 seats. Congress only won at least 28 seats, to come fourth in a state that sends most MPs to the Lok Sabha, as India’s lower house of parliament is called.</p>
<p>The result follows a bleak 2011 for Congress at a national level and portends poorly for the next general elections in 2014, especially now its hoped-for prime minister Gandhi failed to win over voters. Numerous corruption scandals over the past 12 months or so have scuttled the government’s reform drive as smaller coalition partners have splintered off and thwarted any significant changes.</p>
<p>The most glaring reform defeat was Congress’ announcement last year that India would allow foreign department store owners such as Walmart to set up in India. This decision, which didn’t require the passing of any laws, was overturned within days after Congress’ coalition partners, opposition parties and state governments objected to a move that is seen as threatening the family-run stores prevalent throughout India. Other stalled reforms include attempts to clarify land acquisition, strengthen anti-corruption measures and overhaul insurance and investment management.</p>
<p><strong>Investor verdict</strong><br />
Congress was hoping that a strong performance across the five states would pressure its rebelling federal coalition partners or prompt its outside supporters such as the Samajwadi Party to push on with reforms. Better results may have also improved the morale and determination of Singh’s rattled-looking government.</p>
<p>Even if a Congress-led coalition holds onto power in 2014 (and Congress has ruled India for most of the post-independence era), it’s now more likely to be a far more unwieldy coalition than the one that so excited investors in 2009. The Congress-led coalition that ruled India from 2004 to 2009 was a disjointed coalition that included Communist MPs.</p>
<p>Investors were disappointed with the state election results. “We view the election results as negative for economic reforms and the markets, though a key uncertainty has been lifted,” said Goldman Sachs in a report on the election.  “We think the results will not provide the political space for the government or the confidence to carry through unpopular reforms.”</p>
<p>Congress did win a majority in the northeastern state of Manipur and in the Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, but it fizzled in the northern state of Punjab (won by the incumbent alliance of the Shrimoni Akali Dal and Hindu-based Bharatiya Janata Party) and in the western state of Goa (won from Congress by the Bharatiya Janata Party).</p>
<p>Congress has much work to do to spark another rally in shares.</p>
<p> <em>This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”).  Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity Worldwide Investment. This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.  You should consider these matters before acting on the information.  You also should consider the Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for respective Fidelity products before making a decision whether to acquire or hold the product.  The relevant PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading from our website at <a href="http://www.fidelity.com.au/">www.fidelity.com.au</a>. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Details about Fidelity Australia’s provision of financial services to retail clients are set out in our Financial Services Guide, a copy of which can be downloaded from our website at <a href="http://www.fidelity.com.au/">www.fidelity.com.au</a>. © 2012 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity Worldwide Investment and the Fidelity Worldwide Investment logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/03/india%e2%80%99s-state-elections-deal-blow-to-economic-reform-hopes/">India’s state elections deal blow to economic reform hopes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/03/india%e2%80%99s-state-elections-deal-blow-to-economic-reform-hopes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>