<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceAustralia&#039;s budget 2012: surplus or bust</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/05/australias-budget-2012-surplus-or-bust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/05/australias-budget-2012-surplus-or-bust/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Australia&#8217;s budget 2012: surplus or bust</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/05/australias-budget-2012-surplus-or-bust/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/05/australias-budget-2012-surplus-or-bust/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Economic Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commsec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craig James]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=14489</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Budget is hardly the most riveting document you are ever likely to read. Sure you know it’s important, but the problem is that it’s a huge document with countless facts, figures and tables. And when it comes to analysis, economists seem to be writing for other economists; and accountants writing for other accountants.</p>
<p>It’s always important to remember that it is just a budget, the same that any household or company would prepare. Assumptions are made; forecasts are taken.</p>
<p>For instance the first forecast for the 2011/12 budget outcome was made in May 2008 and a surplus of $18.9 billion was projected. By May 2009 that estimate had blown out to a deficit of $44.5 billion. The deficit for the twelve months to March was just above $38 billion and the latest estimates project a deficit near $44 billion for the current financial year.</p>
<p>But at the end of the day most people want to know what’s in it for them. It doesn’t matter whether you are a student, pensioner or CEO of a major company.</p>
<p>So we have decided to make this analysis different.</p>
<p>Sure, there are the usual tables, graphs, facts and figures. But we reckon that there are only three questions most people want answered and that’s where we will be concentrating:</p>
<ul>
<li>Did the Government get it right?</li>
<li>What does it mean for Australia?</li>
<li>Who are the winners and losers?</li>
</ul>
<p>To read CommSec&#8217;s budget analysis, <a title="CommSec budget analysis" href="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/CommSec_Budget-surplus-or-bust.pdf">click here</a>.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Budget is hardly the most riveting document you are ever likely to read. Sure you know it’s important, but the problem is that it’s a huge document with countless facts, figures and tables. And when it comes to analysis, economists seem to be writing for other economists; and accountants writing for other accountants.</p>
<p>It’s always important to remember that it is just a budget, the same that any household or company would prepare. Assumptions are made; forecasts are taken.</p>
<p>For instance the first forecast for the 2011/12 budget outcome was made in May 2008 and a surplus of $18.9 billion was projected. By May 2009 that estimate had blown out to a deficit of $44.5 billion. The deficit for the twelve months to March was just above $38 billion and the latest estimates project a deficit near $44 billion for the current financial year.</p>
<p>But at the end of the day most people want to know what’s in it for them. It doesn’t matter whether you are a student, pensioner or CEO of a major company.</p>
<p>So we have decided to make this analysis different.</p>
<p>Sure, there are the usual tables, graphs, facts and figures. But we reckon that there are only three questions most people want answered and that’s where we will be concentrating:</p>
<ul>
<li>Did the Government get it right?</li>
<li>What does it mean for Australia?</li>
<li>Who are the winners and losers?</li>
</ul>
<p>To read CommSec&#8217;s budget analysis, <a title="CommSec budget analysis" href="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/CommSec_Budget-surplus-or-bust.pdf">click here</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/05/australias-budget-2012-surplus-or-bust/">Australia&#8217;s budget 2012: surplus or bust</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2012/05/australias-budget-2012-surplus-or-bust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>