<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoicePlanner risk report: key findings</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2013/09/planner-risk-report-key-findings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2013/09/planner-risk-report-key-findings/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Planner risk report: key findings</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2013/09/planner-risk-report-key-findings/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2013/09/planner-risk-report-key-findings/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Trends + Ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIA Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July 2013 Investment Trends Planner Risk Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macquarie Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recep Peker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zurich]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=24903</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<h2>Key findings of the Investment Trends 2013 Planner Risk Report:</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<div id="attachment_24905" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-24905" class="size-full wp-image-24905 " alt="Life insurance focus eased but still important." src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/lifeguard-250.gif" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-24905" class="wp-caption-text">Life insurance focus eased but still important.</p></div>
<p>Adviser focus on life insurance has fallen back from its peak in 2012, but remains a key area.</li>
<li>Insurance business is even more concentrated, and AMP now tops primary relationships.</li>
<li>Good BDM support is key for retention and acquisition.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Adviser focus on life insurance has fallen back from its peak in 2012, but remains a key area of their businesses</h2>
<p>Following the recovery in investor sentiment and increasing flows to growth assets, adviser focus on life insurance has come back slightly from its peak in 2012, according to a new report released last week from leading wealth researcher Investment Trends.</p>
<p>The<i> July 2013 Investment Trends Planner Risk Report</i> is an in-depth study of Australian financial planners and their usage of insurance. The study is based on a survey of 1,159 financial planners concluded in July 2013.</p>
<p>The amount of client time spent on talking about insurance needs by planners fell slightly to 18%, after reaching the highest level recorded in the seven years of this study last year (20% of client time).</p>
<p>“The volatility in the markets that lasted most of 2011 and 2012 had driven planners to focus on increasing the role of insurance advice within their businesses, but the return in confidence earlier this year has meant planners were able to write a lot more non-risk business this year,” said Investment Trends Senior Analyst Recep Peker. “An outcome of this is that they are again spending the normal amount of time talking to clients about their insurance needs.”</p>
<p>“Despite this, those who write risk estimate they have written 5% more in annualised risk premiums in the last year than we recorded in the previous study, and remain optimistic predicting future growth (as they have for several years).”</p>
<p>The Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms may also be a catalyst for planners to write more risk business, with 23% of planners saying they plan to provide more life insurance advice as a result of FoFA.</p>
<h2>Insurance business has become even more concentrated, and AMP tops primary relationships</h2>
<p>Insurer relationships are changing rapidly, with 29% of planners saying they reduced usage of an insurer in the last 12 months and 35% saying they stopped using an insurer (8% did both).</p>
<p>Those who have been leaving their insurer don’t necessarily start using another insurance provider, which is evidenced in the average number of insurers used by planners declining from 3.8 each to 3.4 each.</p>
<p>“This has resulted in the greater concentration of risk businesses written,” said Peker. “Planners write 64% of premiums through their most-used insurance provider, up from 61% in 2012 and 54% just five years ago.”</p>
<p>“It has become <i>even more</i> crucial to be a planner’s most-used insurance provider.”</p>
<p>AMP and AIA posted strong gains in primary market shares. The top five insurance providers by number of primary planner relationships are now:</p>
<ol start="1">
<li>AMP</li>
<li>OnePath/ANZ</li>
<li>AIA Australia</li>
<li>TAL</li>
<li>BT Life</li>
</ol>
<h2>Platforms are becoming more important in the insurance market</h2>
<p>The proportion of these risk premiums written on platforms is on the up, with planners writing 39% of new risk business via a master trust or wrap platform. This is up from 34% of premiums just last year, and up from almost zero ten years ago.</p>
<p>“The reason this is so significant is because the concentration of risk business is even greater among advisers using platforms, partly due to the limited range of insurers available on most platforms,” said Peker. “This means insurers without a platform will need a more compelling proposition to compete.”</p>
<p>Having multiple insurance providers available on platforms could help drive more insurance business to platforms.</p>
<p>“The main factor inhibiting more risk businesses on platforms is the limited range of insurers on offer, and indeed planners continue to ask for choice of insurer on platforms, most often because they believe this allows them to provide the best deal for the client.”</p>
<h2>Good BDM support is key to retention and acquisition</h2>
<p>“Satisfaction is crucial in the insurance space, as business is not very sticky and planners can easily stop writing new business on an insurance provider,” said Peker. “That’s why there is a very strong relationship between satisfaction and switching behaviour.”</p>
<p>“Relative to their market share, insurers with lower overall satisfaction ratings from their users experience a higher proportion of planners leaving or switching to other insurers.”</p>
<p>Planners’ satisfaction with their insurers remained high, but fell slightly from the levels achieved in 2012. The top three insurance providers by overall planner satisfaction in 2013 were:</p>
<ol start="1">
<li>TAL</li>
<li>Zurich</li>
<li>Macquarie Life</li>
</ol>
<p>Satisfaction with insurers increased the most with <i>business development support</i>, but part of this increase is driven by switching to insurers with better support.</p>
<p>“Good BDM support is a hygiene factor, crucial for both retention and acquisition,” said Peker. “Poor support is a key factor that has caused planners to stop using an insurance provider, and good BDM support is the top selection driver for becoming a planner’s most-used insurer.”</p>
<p>“Although providers now score well for business development support at an industry level, they cannot let service levels falter.”</p>
<p>“Beyond this, planners are demanding further enhancements to underwriting and technology, and these areas will continue to be key battlegrounds for insurance providers over the next year,” said Peker.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Key findings of the Investment Trends 2013 Planner Risk Report:</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<div id="attachment_24905" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-24905" class="size-full wp-image-24905 " alt="Life insurance focus eased but still important." src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/lifeguard-250.gif" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-24905" class="wp-caption-text">Life insurance focus eased but still important.</p></div>
<p>Adviser focus on life insurance has fallen back from its peak in 2012, but remains a key area.</li>
<li>Insurance business is even more concentrated, and AMP now tops primary relationships.</li>
<li>Good BDM support is key for retention and acquisition.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Adviser focus on life insurance has fallen back from its peak in 2012, but remains a key area of their businesses</h2>
<p>Following the recovery in investor sentiment and increasing flows to growth assets, adviser focus on life insurance has come back slightly from its peak in 2012, according to a new report released last week from leading wealth researcher Investment Trends.</p>
<p>The<i> July 2013 Investment Trends Planner Risk Report</i> is an in-depth study of Australian financial planners and their usage of insurance. The study is based on a survey of 1,159 financial planners concluded in July 2013.</p>
<p>The amount of client time spent on talking about insurance needs by planners fell slightly to 18%, after reaching the highest level recorded in the seven years of this study last year (20% of client time).</p>
<p>“The volatility in the markets that lasted most of 2011 and 2012 had driven planners to focus on increasing the role of insurance advice within their businesses, but the return in confidence earlier this year has meant planners were able to write a lot more non-risk business this year,” said Investment Trends Senior Analyst Recep Peker. “An outcome of this is that they are again spending the normal amount of time talking to clients about their insurance needs.”</p>
<p>“Despite this, those who write risk estimate they have written 5% more in annualised risk premiums in the last year than we recorded in the previous study, and remain optimistic predicting future growth (as they have for several years).”</p>
<p>The Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) reforms may also be a catalyst for planners to write more risk business, with 23% of planners saying they plan to provide more life insurance advice as a result of FoFA.</p>
<h2>Insurance business has become even more concentrated, and AMP tops primary relationships</h2>
<p>Insurer relationships are changing rapidly, with 29% of planners saying they reduced usage of an insurer in the last 12 months and 35% saying they stopped using an insurer (8% did both).</p>
<p>Those who have been leaving their insurer don’t necessarily start using another insurance provider, which is evidenced in the average number of insurers used by planners declining from 3.8 each to 3.4 each.</p>
<p>“This has resulted in the greater concentration of risk businesses written,” said Peker. “Planners write 64% of premiums through their most-used insurance provider, up from 61% in 2012 and 54% just five years ago.”</p>
<p>“It has become <i>even more</i> crucial to be a planner’s most-used insurance provider.”</p>
<p>AMP and AIA posted strong gains in primary market shares. The top five insurance providers by number of primary planner relationships are now:</p>
<ol start="1">
<li>AMP</li>
<li>OnePath/ANZ</li>
<li>AIA Australia</li>
<li>TAL</li>
<li>BT Life</li>
</ol>
<h2>Platforms are becoming more important in the insurance market</h2>
<p>The proportion of these risk premiums written on platforms is on the up, with planners writing 39% of new risk business via a master trust or wrap platform. This is up from 34% of premiums just last year, and up from almost zero ten years ago.</p>
<p>“The reason this is so significant is because the concentration of risk business is even greater among advisers using platforms, partly due to the limited range of insurers available on most platforms,” said Peker. “This means insurers without a platform will need a more compelling proposition to compete.”</p>
<p>Having multiple insurance providers available on platforms could help drive more insurance business to platforms.</p>
<p>“The main factor inhibiting more risk businesses on platforms is the limited range of insurers on offer, and indeed planners continue to ask for choice of insurer on platforms, most often because they believe this allows them to provide the best deal for the client.”</p>
<h2>Good BDM support is key to retention and acquisition</h2>
<p>“Satisfaction is crucial in the insurance space, as business is not very sticky and planners can easily stop writing new business on an insurance provider,” said Peker. “That’s why there is a very strong relationship between satisfaction and switching behaviour.”</p>
<p>“Relative to their market share, insurers with lower overall satisfaction ratings from their users experience a higher proportion of planners leaving or switching to other insurers.”</p>
<p>Planners’ satisfaction with their insurers remained high, but fell slightly from the levels achieved in 2012. The top three insurance providers by overall planner satisfaction in 2013 were:</p>
<ol start="1">
<li>TAL</li>
<li>Zurich</li>
<li>Macquarie Life</li>
</ol>
<p>Satisfaction with insurers increased the most with <i>business development support</i>, but part of this increase is driven by switching to insurers with better support.</p>
<p>“Good BDM support is a hygiene factor, crucial for both retention and acquisition,” said Peker. “Poor support is a key factor that has caused planners to stop using an insurance provider, and good BDM support is the top selection driver for becoming a planner’s most-used insurer.”</p>
<p>“Although providers now score well for business development support at an industry level, they cannot let service levels falter.”</p>
<p>“Beyond this, planners are demanding further enhancements to underwriting and technology, and these areas will continue to be key battlegrounds for insurance providers over the next year,” said Peker.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2013/09/planner-risk-report-key-findings/">Planner risk report: key findings</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2013/09/planner-risk-report-key-findings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>