<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceAustralia needs a new framework for financial advice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2014/09/australia-needs-new-framework-financial-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2014/09/australia-needs-new-framework-financial-advice/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Australia needs a new framework for financial advice</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2014/09/australia-needs-new-framework-financial-advice/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2014/09/australia-needs-new-framework-financial-advice/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 22:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial system inquiry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSC Financial System Inquiry submission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brogden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Review]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=32577</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_26056" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Brogden-John-250.gif"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-26056" class="size-full wp-image-26056" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Brogden-John-250.gif" alt="John Brogden" width="250" height="180" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-26056" class="wp-caption-text">John Brogden</p></div>
<h3>The Financial Services Council has called for new architecture for Australia’s financial advice industry.</h3>
<p>John Brogden, CEO of the FSC said: “Significantly improved adviser education, increased ASIC powers and greater disclosure of experience and ownership are needed to increase public confidence in financial advice.”</p>
<p>The FSC’s submission to the Financial System Inquiry recommends a revised model for financial advice which includes an Advice Competency Standards Board to oversee the development of competency standards, adviser education and the register of advisers.</p>
<p>“Where appropriate ASIC should have new powers to prevent someone from managing a financial services business,”  Mr Brogden said.</p>
<p>“The FSC supports an enhanced public register of advisers which discloses the ultimate owner of the licensee.”</p>
<p>“Consumers  have the right to know the ownership and alignment of the adviser they are dealing with.  The register should disclose the education, experience and history of advisers.”</p>
<p>The FSC has also called for greater clarity on the definitions of financial advice.</p>
<p>“Better definitions and labelling of advice and sound architecture for building competencies are critical to gaining the trust and confidence of consumers,” Mr Brogden said.</p>
<p>“We have recommended the Murray Review considers a model which establishes clear segments of personal advice, general information, factual information and intrafund advice and for new adviser competencies to address these segments.”</p>
<p>“Our revised model for advice clearly distinguishes between personal advice and information and ensures consumers will receive appropriate advice from advisers with appropriate competency and skills,” he said.</p>
<p>The FSC’s submission highlighted four areas where more work needs to be done in the advice sector including:</p>
<ul>
<li>clarification of the different segments of financial advice</li>
<li>adviser competence and professionalism</li>
<li>governance and disclosure, and</li>
<li>increased powers for ASIC.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.fsc.org.au/downloads/file/policyresearch/140826-FSICHAPTER4-INTERNATIONAL.PDF" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read the FSC Financial System Inquiry submission.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_26056" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Brogden-John-250.gif"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-26056" class="size-full wp-image-26056" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Brogden-John-250.gif" alt="John Brogden" width="250" height="180" /></a><p id="caption-attachment-26056" class="wp-caption-text">John Brogden</p></div>
<h3>The Financial Services Council has called for new architecture for Australia’s financial advice industry.</h3>
<p>John Brogden, CEO of the FSC said: “Significantly improved adviser education, increased ASIC powers and greater disclosure of experience and ownership are needed to increase public confidence in financial advice.”</p>
<p>The FSC’s submission to the Financial System Inquiry recommends a revised model for financial advice which includes an Advice Competency Standards Board to oversee the development of competency standards, adviser education and the register of advisers.</p>
<p>“Where appropriate ASIC should have new powers to prevent someone from managing a financial services business,”  Mr Brogden said.</p>
<p>“The FSC supports an enhanced public register of advisers which discloses the ultimate owner of the licensee.”</p>
<p>“Consumers  have the right to know the ownership and alignment of the adviser they are dealing with.  The register should disclose the education, experience and history of advisers.”</p>
<p>The FSC has also called for greater clarity on the definitions of financial advice.</p>
<p>“Better definitions and labelling of advice and sound architecture for building competencies are critical to gaining the trust and confidence of consumers,” Mr Brogden said.</p>
<p>“We have recommended the Murray Review considers a model which establishes clear segments of personal advice, general information, factual information and intrafund advice and for new adviser competencies to address these segments.”</p>
<p>“Our revised model for advice clearly distinguishes between personal advice and information and ensures consumers will receive appropriate advice from advisers with appropriate competency and skills,” he said.</p>
<p>The FSC’s submission highlighted four areas where more work needs to be done in the advice sector including:</p>
<ul>
<li>clarification of the different segments of financial advice</li>
<li>adviser competence and professionalism</li>
<li>governance and disclosure, and</li>
<li>increased powers for ASIC.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.fsc.org.au/downloads/file/policyresearch/140826-FSICHAPTER4-INTERNATIONAL.PDF" target="_blank">Click here</a> to read the FSC Financial System Inquiry submission.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2014/09/australia-needs-new-framework-financial-advice/">Australia needs a new framework for financial advice</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2014/09/australia-needs-new-framework-financial-advice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>