<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceChanges to accountancy rules has ‘upside’ for SMSFs - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/03/changes-to-accountancy-rules-has-upside-for-smsfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/03/changes-to-accountancy-rules-has-upside-for-smsfs/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:51:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Changes to accountancy rules has ‘upside’ for SMSFs</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/03/changes-to-accountancy-rules-has-upside-for-smsfs/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/03/changes-to-accountancy-rules-has-upside-for-smsfs/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 20:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[SMSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olivia Long]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=42327</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_30356" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-30356" class="size-full wp-image-30356" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Long-Olivia-250.jpg" alt="Olivia Long" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-30356" class="wp-caption-text">Olivia Long</p></div>
<h3>Suggestions that new entry and licensing requirements for SMSF auditors and accountants from 1 July would see many SMSF trustees wind up their funds because of rising costs are far-fetched, says Olivia Long, chief executive officer of the SMSF administrators Xpress Super and SuperGuardian.</h3>
<p>“Scale administration businesses can absorb licencing costs and additional workload. It may see a small increase in fees, but certainly nothing so drastic as to force trustees to wind-up their funds.</p>
<p>“What I believe will happen is that accountants wanting to continue servicing SMSF trustees post 1 July will focus on only servicing a smaller number of clients, but in a more strategic way.</p>
<p>“For administration and daily online reporting, I suspect they will offload those services to specialist SMSF administrators where they can be delivered at a fraction of the cost – and in a professional way.</p>
<p>“In this scenario, accountants can attract higher fees for offering strategic advice and administrators can do the legwork at a competitive price.”</p>
<p>Long says the removal of the accountants’ exemption should be viewed as a “positive move” for the profession as it will make them re-think their value proposition.</p>
<p>“Accountants have to realise their future role in SMSFs is offering strategic advice that allows SMSF trustees to plan long-term; it’s not the day-to-day minutia that can be competently handled by administrators,” she says.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_30356" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-30356" class="size-full wp-image-30356" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Long-Olivia-250.jpg" alt="Olivia Long" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-30356" class="wp-caption-text">Olivia Long</p></div>
<h3>Suggestions that new entry and licensing requirements for SMSF auditors and accountants from 1 July would see many SMSF trustees wind up their funds because of rising costs are far-fetched, says Olivia Long, chief executive officer of the SMSF administrators Xpress Super and SuperGuardian.</h3>
<p>“Scale administration businesses can absorb licencing costs and additional workload. It may see a small increase in fees, but certainly nothing so drastic as to force trustees to wind-up their funds.</p>
<p>“What I believe will happen is that accountants wanting to continue servicing SMSF trustees post 1 July will focus on only servicing a smaller number of clients, but in a more strategic way.</p>
<p>“For administration and daily online reporting, I suspect they will offload those services to specialist SMSF administrators where they can be delivered at a fraction of the cost – and in a professional way.</p>
<p>“In this scenario, accountants can attract higher fees for offering strategic advice and administrators can do the legwork at a competitive price.”</p>
<p>Long says the removal of the accountants’ exemption should be viewed as a “positive move” for the profession as it will make them re-think their value proposition.</p>
<p>“Accountants have to realise their future role in SMSFs is offering strategic advice that allows SMSF trustees to plan long-term; it’s not the day-to-day minutia that can be competently handled by administrators,” she says.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/03/changes-to-accountancy-rules-has-upside-for-smsfs/">Changes to accountancy rules has ‘upside’ for SMSFs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/03/changes-to-accountancy-rules-has-upside-for-smsfs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>