<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceATO guidelines on safe harbour for related party LRBAs - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/04/ato-guidelines-on-safe-harbour-for-related-party-lrbas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/04/ato-guidelines-on-safe-harbour-for-related-party-lrbas/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>ATO guidelines on safe harbour for related party LRBAs</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/04/ato-guidelines-on-safe-harbour-for-related-party-lrbas/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/04/ato-guidelines-on-safe-harbour-for-related-party-lrbas/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2016 21:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[From the Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Hallinan]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=42587</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p><em>“… not as comfortable or as accommodating as one would have hoped from a safe harbour” Michael Hallinan </em></p>
<p>The ATO has issued its Practical Compliance Guidelines as to what constitutes a “safe harbour” for related party LRBAs. The Guidelines provided guidance only in relation to real property LRBAs and listed shares/securities LRBAs.</p>
<p>No guidance (practical or otherwise) has been provided for private unit trust LRBAs.  Further, the guidance provided is not as comfortable or as accommodating as one would have hoped from a safe harbour.  In particular the maximum LVRs, maximum duration and minimum interest rates are not comfortable.</p>
<p>However, three important points should be made:</p>
<ol>
<li>The release of the Guidelines together with the revised IDs 2015/27 and 28 essentially means that the policy arguments for banning LRBAs are now removed</li>
<li>An arrangement outside the parameters of the Guidelines is not automatically “beyond the Pale” as benchmarking remains an option</li>
<li>Finally, the practical assistance provided by the Guidelines can only be assessed by living with and experiencing the joy of restructuring of an LRBA to be within the harbour.</li>
</ol>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“… not as comfortable or as accommodating as one would have hoped from a safe harbour” Michael Hallinan </em></p>
<p>The ATO has issued its Practical Compliance Guidelines as to what constitutes a “safe harbour” for related party LRBAs. The Guidelines provided guidance only in relation to real property LRBAs and listed shares/securities LRBAs.</p>
<p>No guidance (practical or otherwise) has been provided for private unit trust LRBAs.  Further, the guidance provided is not as comfortable or as accommodating as one would have hoped from a safe harbour.  In particular the maximum LVRs, maximum duration and minimum interest rates are not comfortable.</p>
<p>However, three important points should be made:</p>
<ol>
<li>The release of the Guidelines together with the revised IDs 2015/27 and 28 essentially means that the policy arguments for banning LRBAs are now removed</li>
<li>An arrangement outside the parameters of the Guidelines is not automatically “beyond the Pale” as benchmarking remains an option</li>
<li>Finally, the practical assistance provided by the Guidelines can only be assessed by living with and experiencing the joy of restructuring of an LRBA to be within the harbour.</li>
</ol>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/04/ato-guidelines-on-safe-harbour-for-related-party-lrbas/">ATO guidelines on safe harbour for related party LRBAs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/04/ato-guidelines-on-safe-harbour-for-related-party-lrbas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>