<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceANZ to refund nearly $29 million to more than 390,000 accounts as a result of unclear fee disclosures - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/09/anz-refund-nearly-29-million-390000-accounts-result-unclear-fee-disclosures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/09/anz-refund-nearly-29-million-390000-accounts-result-unclear-fee-disclosures/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 21:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>ANZ to refund nearly $29 million to more than 390,000 accounts as a result of unclear fee disclosures</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/09/anz-refund-nearly-29-million-390000-accounts-result-unclear-fee-disclosures/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/09/anz-refund-nearly-29-million-390000-accounts-result-unclear-fee-disclosures/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2016 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Regulation/Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Kell]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=45030</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) is refunding $28.8 million to 376,570 retail accounts, and 17,230 business accounts, after it failed to clearly disclose when certain periodical payment fees would apply.</h3>
<p>Periodical payments are automatic &#8216;set and forget&#8217; fixed-amount payments put in place by the customer. They are an alternative to direct debit arrangements, and allow customers to establish a regular payment to another account (for example, to make fortnightly rental payments). Banks may charge a fee for this service, depending on the terms and conditions for the account.</p>
<p>In ANZ&#8217;s case, the account terms and conditions stated that a periodical payment was a transaction to &#8216;another person or business.&#8217; This meant that transactions made by the customer to another account in the customer&#8217;s own name, whether with ANZ or another financial institution, were not covered by ANZ&#8217;s own definition of a periodical payment and could not be charged the fees that could otherwise apply to periodical payments.</p>
<p>ANZ discovered that it was charging fees on payments made between accounts held in the customer&#8217;s own name, contrary to its definition of a &#8216;periodical payment&#8217;. ANZ subsequently reported the matter to ASIC as a significant breach of its financial services obligations. ASIC acknowledges the cooperative approach taken by ANZ in its handling of this matter, and its appropriate reporting of the matter to ASIC.</p>
<p>As a result, ANZ will refund fees that were charged to customers for payments into another account in the customer&#8217;s own name.  These fees include:</p>
<ul>
<li>non-payment fees charged on personal and commercial accounts when the payment did not proceed because of insufficient funds held in the ANZ deposit account; and</li>
<li>payment fees charged on commercial accoumts when a payment is processed from the ANZ deposit account.</li>
</ul>
<p>The total amount being refunded includes approximately $25.8 million of fees, with an additional $3 million in interest.</p>
<p>ANZ has subsequently changed its terms and conditions to clarify instances where fees for periodical payments apply to an ANZ deposit account.</p>
<p>ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said, &#8216;Good fee disclosure is integral to ensuring that consumers are in an informed position about how best to manage the cost of their banking.&#8217;</p>
<p>ANZ has commenced contacting affected customers to explain the impact and the reimbursement and expects to complete the remediation process by the end of September 2016.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) is refunding $28.8 million to 376,570 retail accounts, and 17,230 business accounts, after it failed to clearly disclose when certain periodical payment fees would apply.</h3>
<p>Periodical payments are automatic &#8216;set and forget&#8217; fixed-amount payments put in place by the customer. They are an alternative to direct debit arrangements, and allow customers to establish a regular payment to another account (for example, to make fortnightly rental payments). Banks may charge a fee for this service, depending on the terms and conditions for the account.</p>
<p>In ANZ&#8217;s case, the account terms and conditions stated that a periodical payment was a transaction to &#8216;another person or business.&#8217; This meant that transactions made by the customer to another account in the customer&#8217;s own name, whether with ANZ or another financial institution, were not covered by ANZ&#8217;s own definition of a periodical payment and could not be charged the fees that could otherwise apply to periodical payments.</p>
<p>ANZ discovered that it was charging fees on payments made between accounts held in the customer&#8217;s own name, contrary to its definition of a &#8216;periodical payment&#8217;. ANZ subsequently reported the matter to ASIC as a significant breach of its financial services obligations. ASIC acknowledges the cooperative approach taken by ANZ in its handling of this matter, and its appropriate reporting of the matter to ASIC.</p>
<p>As a result, ANZ will refund fees that were charged to customers for payments into another account in the customer&#8217;s own name.  These fees include:</p>
<ul>
<li>non-payment fees charged on personal and commercial accounts when the payment did not proceed because of insufficient funds held in the ANZ deposit account; and</li>
<li>payment fees charged on commercial accoumts when a payment is processed from the ANZ deposit account.</li>
</ul>
<p>The total amount being refunded includes approximately $25.8 million of fees, with an additional $3 million in interest.</p>
<p>ANZ has subsequently changed its terms and conditions to clarify instances where fees for periodical payments apply to an ANZ deposit account.</p>
<p>ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said, &#8216;Good fee disclosure is integral to ensuring that consumers are in an informed position about how best to manage the cost of their banking.&#8217;</p>
<p>ANZ has commenced contacting affected customers to explain the impact and the reimbursement and expects to complete the remediation process by the end of September 2016.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/09/anz-refund-nearly-29-million-390000-accounts-result-unclear-fee-disclosures/">ANZ to refund nearly $29 million to more than 390,000 accounts as a result of unclear fee disclosures</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2016/09/anz-refund-nearly-29-million-390000-accounts-result-unclear-fee-disclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>