<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceRich List release highlights HNW asset allocation divergence - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/06/rich-list-release-highlights-hnw-asset-allocation-divergence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/06/rich-list-release-highlights-hnw-asset-allocation-divergence/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:25:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Rich List release highlights HNW asset allocation divergence</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/06/rich-list-release-highlights-hnw-asset-allocation-divergence/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/06/rich-list-release-highlights-hnw-asset-allocation-divergence/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 21:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[From the Source]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=49452</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_49376" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49376" class="size-full wp-image-49376" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/murchie-adam-250.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-49376" class="wp-caption-text">Adam Murchie</p></div>
<h3>The release last week of the BRW Rich 200 List highlighted a significant demarcation between the asset allocation of HNW investors and the asset allocation prescribed for ordinary Australians.</h3>
<p>Traditional retail client financial advice asset allocation would see asset allocations in the following ranges:</p>
<ul>
<li>Australian shares (35%) – range 25% to 45%</li>
<li>International shares (25%) – range 15% to 35%</li>
<li>Australian property (10%) – range 5% to 20%</li>
<li>Cash (5%) – range 0% to 10%</li>
<li>Australian bonds (15%) – range 10% to 25%</li>
<li>International bonds (10%) – range 5% to 20%</li>
<li>Overall growth assets (70%) – range 50% to 80%</li>
</ul>
<p>Compare this with the Capigemi Asia Pacific Wealth Report 2016, which indicates that Australia’s HNW investors have the following asset allocation:</p>
<ul>
<li>Equities 27.9%</li>
<li>Property 25.6%</li>
<li>Cash 19.0%</li>
<li>Australian bonds 14.6%</li>
<li>Alternative investments 12.9%</li>
</ul>
<p>The above asset allocations for HNW Australian investors is further supported by the recent release of the BRW Rich 200 List. In particular, asset allocation to property featured heavily; of the list, 80 people (40%) either made their wealth in property, or it is a major store of their wealth. On the same basis, property was a primary asset class for 47.55% of the Rich List wealth.</p>
<p>Adam Murchie, a director of Forza Capital said, “For a long time this demarcation between the investment allocation of the wealthy and that applied to retail investors has interested us.”</p>
<p>“We often wonder why retail investment allocation is not more closely aligned to those who have had immense investment success”.</p>
<p>In particular, the heavy slant to property also has the benefit of removing volatility.</p>
<p>Mr Murchie continued, “Research undertaken by Atchison Consultants indicates that the higher a proportion of direct property in a portfolio, the lower propensity for price volatility and capital loss.”</p>
<p>“Furthermore, it has been highlighted that based on traditional portfolio theory, 90% of a retail investors’ portfolio volatility comes from their 60% allocation to equities. It is no wonder then that HNW investors favour more illiquid assets, property in particular, to mitigate portfolio fluctuations and risk.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_49376" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignright"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-49376" class="size-full wp-image-49376" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/murchie-adam-250.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-49376" class="wp-caption-text">Adam Murchie</p></div>
<h3>The release last week of the BRW Rich 200 List highlighted a significant demarcation between the asset allocation of HNW investors and the asset allocation prescribed for ordinary Australians.</h3>
<p>Traditional retail client financial advice asset allocation would see asset allocations in the following ranges:</p>
<ul>
<li>Australian shares (35%) – range 25% to 45%</li>
<li>International shares (25%) – range 15% to 35%</li>
<li>Australian property (10%) – range 5% to 20%</li>
<li>Cash (5%) – range 0% to 10%</li>
<li>Australian bonds (15%) – range 10% to 25%</li>
<li>International bonds (10%) – range 5% to 20%</li>
<li>Overall growth assets (70%) – range 50% to 80%</li>
</ul>
<p>Compare this with the Capigemi Asia Pacific Wealth Report 2016, which indicates that Australia’s HNW investors have the following asset allocation:</p>
<ul>
<li>Equities 27.9%</li>
<li>Property 25.6%</li>
<li>Cash 19.0%</li>
<li>Australian bonds 14.6%</li>
<li>Alternative investments 12.9%</li>
</ul>
<p>The above asset allocations for HNW Australian investors is further supported by the recent release of the BRW Rich 200 List. In particular, asset allocation to property featured heavily; of the list, 80 people (40%) either made their wealth in property, or it is a major store of their wealth. On the same basis, property was a primary asset class for 47.55% of the Rich List wealth.</p>
<p>Adam Murchie, a director of Forza Capital said, “For a long time this demarcation between the investment allocation of the wealthy and that applied to retail investors has interested us.”</p>
<p>“We often wonder why retail investment allocation is not more closely aligned to those who have had immense investment success”.</p>
<p>In particular, the heavy slant to property also has the benefit of removing volatility.</p>
<p>Mr Murchie continued, “Research undertaken by Atchison Consultants indicates that the higher a proportion of direct property in a portfolio, the lower propensity for price volatility and capital loss.”</p>
<p>“Furthermore, it has been highlighted that based on traditional portfolio theory, 90% of a retail investors’ portfolio volatility comes from their 60% allocation to equities. It is no wonder then that HNW investors favour more illiquid assets, property in particular, to mitigate portfolio fluctuations and risk.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/06/rich-list-release-highlights-hnw-asset-allocation-divergence/">Rich List release highlights HNW asset allocation divergence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/06/rich-list-release-highlights-hnw-asset-allocation-divergence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>