<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceIMF too optimistic on EM debt, says Eaton Vance - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/11/imf-optimistic-em-debt-says-eaton-vance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/11/imf-optimistic-em-debt-says-eaton-vance/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:30:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>IMF too optimistic on EM debt, says Eaton Vance</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/11/imf-optimistic-em-debt-says-eaton-vance/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/11/imf-optimistic-em-debt-says-eaton-vance/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2017 20:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Economic Update]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=52090</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_52091" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-52091" class="size-full wp-image-52091" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/international-monetray-fund-IMF-250.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-52091" class="wp-caption-text">IMF entrance &#8211; Washington DC.</p></div>
<h3>Investors may be wise to take with a grain of salt the International Monetary Fund&#8217;s latest projections about the sustainability of emerging market (EM) debt levels, says the global investment manager Eaton Vance.</h3>
<p>The source of this advice is impeccable: the IMF, notes the Eaton Vance Global Income team.</p>
<p>A new IMF study<sup>[1]</sup> of its own &#8220;debt sustainability analyses&#8221; found that the studies have been overly confident about fiscal and/or growth forecasts, exchange-rate growth and projected &#8220;residuals&#8221; like other external financing. Interest rates were consistently projected to be too high.</p>
<p>The study found that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Debt projection errors were skewed toward optimism for most groups of countries. Evidence of systematic bias toward optimism was observed even after controls were applied for major economic shocks.</li>
<li>The magnitude of errors tended to increase as forecast horizons extend (1-5 years after).</li>
<li>The degree of optimism observed has increased over successive vintages for most groups of countries.</li>
</ul>
<p>The study looked at projected debt-to-GDP levels for both external and total public debt, and compared them with actual outcomes over a five-year forecasting horizon. The analysis focused on 75 countries designated as &#8220;low-income countries&#8221; by the IMF according to GNP per capita between 2005 and 2015.</p>
<p>Optimism was most pronounced for:</p>
<ul>
<li>The wealthiest half of countries examined, even though all were low-income, by definition.</li>
<li>Countries designated &#8220;frontier&#8221; by the IMF &#8211; those with market access or potential for market access.</li>
<li>Those assessed to have &#8220;moderate risk for debt distress.&#8221;</li>
<li>Countries with IMF programs.</li>
</ul>
<p>“ Our own experience suggests that the IMF study is still underestimating the problem: Debt burdens of many EM countries may be even less sustainable than is indicated. That&#8217;s why we believe that a focus on individual country fundamentals through proprietary research is the key to successful investing in EM debt.”</p>
<h6>[1] IMF Working Paper: Debt Sustainability Analyses for Low-Income Countries: An Assessment of Projection Performance, by Henry Mooney and Constance de Soyres, September 2017</h6>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_52091" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-52091" class="size-full wp-image-52091" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/international-monetray-fund-IMF-250.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-52091" class="wp-caption-text">IMF entrance &#8211; Washington DC.</p></div>
<h3>Investors may be wise to take with a grain of salt the International Monetary Fund&#8217;s latest projections about the sustainability of emerging market (EM) debt levels, says the global investment manager Eaton Vance.</h3>
<p>The source of this advice is impeccable: the IMF, notes the Eaton Vance Global Income team.</p>
<p>A new IMF study<sup>[1]</sup> of its own &#8220;debt sustainability analyses&#8221; found that the studies have been overly confident about fiscal and/or growth forecasts, exchange-rate growth and projected &#8220;residuals&#8221; like other external financing. Interest rates were consistently projected to be too high.</p>
<p>The study found that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Debt projection errors were skewed toward optimism for most groups of countries. Evidence of systematic bias toward optimism was observed even after controls were applied for major economic shocks.</li>
<li>The magnitude of errors tended to increase as forecast horizons extend (1-5 years after).</li>
<li>The degree of optimism observed has increased over successive vintages for most groups of countries.</li>
</ul>
<p>The study looked at projected debt-to-GDP levels for both external and total public debt, and compared them with actual outcomes over a five-year forecasting horizon. The analysis focused on 75 countries designated as &#8220;low-income countries&#8221; by the IMF according to GNP per capita between 2005 and 2015.</p>
<p>Optimism was most pronounced for:</p>
<ul>
<li>The wealthiest half of countries examined, even though all were low-income, by definition.</li>
<li>Countries designated &#8220;frontier&#8221; by the IMF &#8211; those with market access or potential for market access.</li>
<li>Those assessed to have &#8220;moderate risk for debt distress.&#8221;</li>
<li>Countries with IMF programs.</li>
</ul>
<p>“ Our own experience suggests that the IMF study is still underestimating the problem: Debt burdens of many EM countries may be even less sustainable than is indicated. That&#8217;s why we believe that a focus on individual country fundamentals through proprietary research is the key to successful investing in EM debt.”</p>
<h6>[1] IMF Working Paper: Debt Sustainability Analyses for Low-Income Countries: An Assessment of Projection Performance, by Henry Mooney and Constance de Soyres, September 2017</h6>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/11/imf-optimistic-em-debt-says-eaton-vance/">IMF too optimistic on EM debt, says Eaton Vance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2017/11/imf-optimistic-em-debt-says-eaton-vance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>