<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceReporting season dominated by cost pressures and high P/E- What does this mean for investors? - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2018/09/reporting-season-dominated-by-cost-pressures-and-high-p-e-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2018/09/reporting-season-dominated-by-cost-pressures-and-high-p-e-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 21:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Reporting season dominated by cost pressures and high P/E- What does this mean for investors?</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2018/09/reporting-season-dominated-by-cost-pressures-and-high-p-e-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2018/09/reporting-season-dominated-by-cost-pressures-and-high-p-e-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2018 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reece Birtles]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=57430</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_53552" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-53552" class="size-full wp-image-53552" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/20180208-Reece-Birtles-250x180-1.jpg" alt="Reece Birtles" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-53552" class="wp-caption-text">Reece Birtles</p></div>
<h3>The current Australian reporting season has largely overlooked the fundamentals, instead rewarding stocks with high P/E ratios regardless of lackluster earnings, according to the active equity specialist Martin Currie, an affiliate of Legg Mason, one of the world&#8217;s largest funds management groups.</h3>
<p>Martin Currie Australia, Chief Investment Officer, Reece Birtles says that despite the positive economic backdrop, revenue environment and underlying fundamentals of Australian companies, disappointingly, EPS revisions post-result have had the worst negative skew in 10 years, although the aggregate downgrade has been mild.</p>
<p>“There appears to be no strong macro or sectorial theme to explain the direction of EPS revisions, but the nature of the earnings revisions is quite clear – cost pressures and falling margins, with operating expenditure and capital expenditure increasing after years of restraint and cost cutting.</p>
<p>“There is a clear dichotomy in the Australian market, split between disdain for increased investment spend amongst stable, profitable companies, but reward for high P/E stocks doing the same thing –   even though increased investment should result in better bottom line growth in the long run for both sets of companies,” he notes.</p>
<p>Based on over 150 company management meetings that Martin Currie Australia analysts have conducted during this reporting season; the key cost and investment pressure themes can be summarised as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Resource sector:</strong> strong recent cashflow is burning a hole in resource company pockets, so we are starting to see them loosen the purse strings to replenish under-invested mines.</li>
<li><strong>Industrials sector:</strong> raw material cost pressure (e.g. oil products, electricity) is too significant to be able to pass onto customers without absorbing some costs into the P&amp;L</li>
<li><strong>Utilities sector:</strong> government intervention is putting pressure on prices and ageing plants require more capex</li>
<li><strong>Real estate sector:</strong> capitalisation rates are too low to buy developed assets, so REITs are having to develop new assets on their balance sheets.</li>
<li><strong>Services in general:</strong> wage cost pressure is key. We have heard stories of companies having to increase wages by high-single digits to retain professional services staff, especially in construction, infrastructure and mining (quite contrary to ABS wages data).</li>
<li><strong>High P/E stocks in general</strong>: we are seeing these companies investing to grow.</li>
</ul>
<p>Birtles says that high P/E (and high momentum) stocks appear to be the ‘flavour du jour’ this reporting season.</p>
<p>“Top quintile stocks by P/E ratio have had flat revenue revisions and negative 1% EPS revision, essentially the same as the lower P/E stocks. However, despite less than stellar fundamental results the market re-rated these names +7% over reporting season. There was no such special treatment for the rest of the market.</p>
<p>“We see this disconnect in the P/E re-rate as the biggest driver of performance over the reporting season. This situation has left high P/E stocks looking their most expensive in 15 years. The only reason Value spreads are not even wider is that low P/E stocks are not as cheap as they were back in 2009.</p>
<p>“The result has been to generate far more share price variance between the best and worst companies relative to earnings revisions variance.</p>
<p>“As value investors, we see these short-term disconnects as opportunities for fundamentally driven research. In the long-term, we believe that fundamental investors may be able to gain an advantage by investing in attractively valued companies with strong long-term earnings power, good free cashflow and disciplined capital investment – rather than just paying up for what is the flavour of the month,” says Birtles.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_53552" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-53552" class="size-full wp-image-53552" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/20180208-Reece-Birtles-250x180-1.jpg" alt="Reece Birtles" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-53552" class="wp-caption-text">Reece Birtles</p></div>
<h3>The current Australian reporting season has largely overlooked the fundamentals, instead rewarding stocks with high P/E ratios regardless of lackluster earnings, according to the active equity specialist Martin Currie, an affiliate of Legg Mason, one of the world&#8217;s largest funds management groups.</h3>
<p>Martin Currie Australia, Chief Investment Officer, Reece Birtles says that despite the positive economic backdrop, revenue environment and underlying fundamentals of Australian companies, disappointingly, EPS revisions post-result have had the worst negative skew in 10 years, although the aggregate downgrade has been mild.</p>
<p>“There appears to be no strong macro or sectorial theme to explain the direction of EPS revisions, but the nature of the earnings revisions is quite clear – cost pressures and falling margins, with operating expenditure and capital expenditure increasing after years of restraint and cost cutting.</p>
<p>“There is a clear dichotomy in the Australian market, split between disdain for increased investment spend amongst stable, profitable companies, but reward for high P/E stocks doing the same thing –   even though increased investment should result in better bottom line growth in the long run for both sets of companies,” he notes.</p>
<p>Based on over 150 company management meetings that Martin Currie Australia analysts have conducted during this reporting season; the key cost and investment pressure themes can be summarised as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Resource sector:</strong> strong recent cashflow is burning a hole in resource company pockets, so we are starting to see them loosen the purse strings to replenish under-invested mines.</li>
<li><strong>Industrials sector:</strong> raw material cost pressure (e.g. oil products, electricity) is too significant to be able to pass onto customers without absorbing some costs into the P&amp;L</li>
<li><strong>Utilities sector:</strong> government intervention is putting pressure on prices and ageing plants require more capex</li>
<li><strong>Real estate sector:</strong> capitalisation rates are too low to buy developed assets, so REITs are having to develop new assets on their balance sheets.</li>
<li><strong>Services in general:</strong> wage cost pressure is key. We have heard stories of companies having to increase wages by high-single digits to retain professional services staff, especially in construction, infrastructure and mining (quite contrary to ABS wages data).</li>
<li><strong>High P/E stocks in general</strong>: we are seeing these companies investing to grow.</li>
</ul>
<p>Birtles says that high P/E (and high momentum) stocks appear to be the ‘flavour du jour’ this reporting season.</p>
<p>“Top quintile stocks by P/E ratio have had flat revenue revisions and negative 1% EPS revision, essentially the same as the lower P/E stocks. However, despite less than stellar fundamental results the market re-rated these names +7% over reporting season. There was no such special treatment for the rest of the market.</p>
<p>“We see this disconnect in the P/E re-rate as the biggest driver of performance over the reporting season. This situation has left high P/E stocks looking their most expensive in 15 years. The only reason Value spreads are not even wider is that low P/E stocks are not as cheap as they were back in 2009.</p>
<p>“The result has been to generate far more share price variance between the best and worst companies relative to earnings revisions variance.</p>
<p>“As value investors, we see these short-term disconnects as opportunities for fundamentally driven research. In the long-term, we believe that fundamental investors may be able to gain an advantage by investing in attractively valued companies with strong long-term earnings power, good free cashflow and disciplined capital investment – rather than just paying up for what is the flavour of the month,” says Birtles.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2018/09/reporting-season-dominated-by-cost-pressures-and-high-p-e-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/">Reporting season dominated by cost pressures and high P/E- What does this mean for investors?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2018/09/reporting-season-dominated-by-cost-pressures-and-high-p-e-what-does-this-mean-for-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>