<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceALP ban on grandfathered commissions another win for big end of town - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2019/02/alp-ban-on-grandfathered-commissions-another-win-for-big-end-of-town/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2019/02/alp-ban-on-grandfathered-commissions-another-win-for-big-end-of-town/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>ALP ban on grandfathered commissions another win for big end of town</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2019/02/alp-ban-on-grandfathered-commissions-another-win-for-big-end-of-town/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2019/02/alp-ban-on-grandfathered-commissions-another-win-for-big-end-of-town/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 20:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[From the Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Kewin]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=60174</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_31387" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-31387" class="size-full wp-image-31387" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Kewin-Philip-250.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-31387" class="wp-caption-text">Philip Kewin</p></div>
<h3>The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) strongly objects to the Australian Labor Party (ALP)’s plan to ban grandfathered commissions on investment and superannuation products by the end of 2019, arguing that it will hand yet another victory to the big end of town at the expense of small financial advice businesses and their clients.</h3>
<p>AFA CEO, Philip Kewin, said, “Attempting to turn off grandfathered commissions in such a short time frame will only serve to benefit institutions who will be able to hold onto them, with no compulsion to pass any benefit on to consumers.  Many clients currently receiving advice services for these payments will lose access to them, without any reduction in their fees.</p>
<p>“If the concern is that some advisers are receiving grandfathered commissions without providing a service, then there are other options to address this issue, without negatively impacting those clients who are in grandfathered commission paying products and are happily receiving services and advice from their financial adviser.”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said the argument that grandfathered commissions have continued for too long is not reflected in the facts.</p>
<p>“There were zero cases of inappropriate financial advice as a result of grandfathered commissions during the Banking Royal Commission hearings and research by Investment Trends indicates that Grandfathered commissions have declined from over 30% of advice practice income in 2010 to just 9% in 2018.</p>
<p>“At no stage have  the objectives and potential consequences been discussed or debated. Both Treasury and ASIC have confirmed that they have not done any research or investigation to confirm the current level of grandfathered commissions or the implications of seeking to remove it.  Achieving the right outcome for clients is a much more complex proposition than is appreciated by any of the proponents for a ban.”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said the proposed ban is therefore simply an issue of political expediency, which numerous stakeholders have sought to use in order to leverage political, media and commercial benefit at the expense of small business and consumers.</p>
<p>“This is neither fair nor acceptable as it jeopardises the livelihoods of professional, hard-working financial advisers. The potential financial and emotional impact on these people is profound. Forcing a transition sooner than practical also jeopardises the ability for clients to remain in an advice relationship. This is unnecessary, especially given that there are avenues for a sensible transition available to the Government and Opposition to consider, should they choose to work with the industry.”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said small business financial advice practice owners have acquired businesses in recent years that include grandfathered commission clients and have taken out loans to fund these acquisitions on the basis of prevailing valuation methods.  These small business owners had no expectation that grandfathered commission arrangements would come to a sudden end.</p>
<p>“The proposal to ban grandfathered commissions in such a short time frame will put them and their businesses at genuine risk,” Mr Kewin said.  “Who has done the work to understand the consequences of this decision?  What level of borrowings are based upon these valuations and how many financial advice businesses will be put at risk of foreclosure?”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said when the ALP introduced the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation into Parliament in 2011, the current Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, who was the relevant Minister at the time, stated in a media release dated 29 August 2011 that based upon advice from the Australian Government Solicitor the FoFA ban on trail commissions would not apply to existing investment and superannuation business.</p>
<p>“We also respectfully remind the ALP that when they introduced the legislation and grandfathered existing trail commissions on existing business, they did not suggest that it was a transitional arrangement or that they expected it to disappear within a limited time frame.”</p>
<p>While the AFA recognises the recommendation of the Banking Royal Commission and the intent of both sides of Parliament to remove Grandfathered commissions, it is calling on all sides of politics to do it in a sensible, informed manner that will not jeopardise the interests of financial advisers or their clients.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_31387" style="width: 260px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-31387" class="size-full wp-image-31387" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Kewin-Philip-250.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="180" /><p id="caption-attachment-31387" class="wp-caption-text">Philip Kewin</p></div>
<h3>The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) strongly objects to the Australian Labor Party (ALP)’s plan to ban grandfathered commissions on investment and superannuation products by the end of 2019, arguing that it will hand yet another victory to the big end of town at the expense of small financial advice businesses and their clients.</h3>
<p>AFA CEO, Philip Kewin, said, “Attempting to turn off grandfathered commissions in such a short time frame will only serve to benefit institutions who will be able to hold onto them, with no compulsion to pass any benefit on to consumers.  Many clients currently receiving advice services for these payments will lose access to them, without any reduction in their fees.</p>
<p>“If the concern is that some advisers are receiving grandfathered commissions without providing a service, then there are other options to address this issue, without negatively impacting those clients who are in grandfathered commission paying products and are happily receiving services and advice from their financial adviser.”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said the argument that grandfathered commissions have continued for too long is not reflected in the facts.</p>
<p>“There were zero cases of inappropriate financial advice as a result of grandfathered commissions during the Banking Royal Commission hearings and research by Investment Trends indicates that Grandfathered commissions have declined from over 30% of advice practice income in 2010 to just 9% in 2018.</p>
<p>“At no stage have  the objectives and potential consequences been discussed or debated. Both Treasury and ASIC have confirmed that they have not done any research or investigation to confirm the current level of grandfathered commissions or the implications of seeking to remove it.  Achieving the right outcome for clients is a much more complex proposition than is appreciated by any of the proponents for a ban.”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said the proposed ban is therefore simply an issue of political expediency, which numerous stakeholders have sought to use in order to leverage political, media and commercial benefit at the expense of small business and consumers.</p>
<p>“This is neither fair nor acceptable as it jeopardises the livelihoods of professional, hard-working financial advisers. The potential financial and emotional impact on these people is profound. Forcing a transition sooner than practical also jeopardises the ability for clients to remain in an advice relationship. This is unnecessary, especially given that there are avenues for a sensible transition available to the Government and Opposition to consider, should they choose to work with the industry.”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said small business financial advice practice owners have acquired businesses in recent years that include grandfathered commission clients and have taken out loans to fund these acquisitions on the basis of prevailing valuation methods.  These small business owners had no expectation that grandfathered commission arrangements would come to a sudden end.</p>
<p>“The proposal to ban grandfathered commissions in such a short time frame will put them and their businesses at genuine risk,” Mr Kewin said.  “Who has done the work to understand the consequences of this decision?  What level of borrowings are based upon these valuations and how many financial advice businesses will be put at risk of foreclosure?”</p>
<p>Mr Kewin said when the ALP introduced the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) legislation into Parliament in 2011, the current Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, who was the relevant Minister at the time, stated in a media release dated 29 August 2011 that based upon advice from the Australian Government Solicitor the FoFA ban on trail commissions would not apply to existing investment and superannuation business.</p>
<p>“We also respectfully remind the ALP that when they introduced the legislation and grandfathered existing trail commissions on existing business, they did not suggest that it was a transitional arrangement or that they expected it to disappear within a limited time frame.”</p>
<p>While the AFA recognises the recommendation of the Banking Royal Commission and the intent of both sides of Parliament to remove Grandfathered commissions, it is calling on all sides of politics to do it in a sensible, informed manner that will not jeopardise the interests of financial advisers or their clients.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2019/02/alp-ban-on-grandfathered-commissions-another-win-for-big-end-of-town/">ALP ban on grandfathered commissions another win for big end of town</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2019/02/alp-ban-on-grandfathered-commissions-another-win-for-big-end-of-town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>