<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceGeopolitical ramifications of the upcoming US election should not be underestimated - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2020/09/geopolitical-ramifications-of-the-upcoming-us-election-should-not-be-underestimated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2020/09/geopolitical-ramifications-of-the-upcoming-us-election-should-not-be-underestimated/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 21:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Geopolitical ramifications of the upcoming US election should not be underestimated</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2020/09/geopolitical-ramifications-of-the-upcoming-us-election-should-not-be-underestimated/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2020/09/geopolitical-ramifications-of-the-upcoming-us-election-should-not-be-underestimated/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2020 21:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Stein]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=70210</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_70212" style="width: 660px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-70212" class="size-full wp-image-70212" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/stein-eric-650.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="350" srcset="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/stein-eric-650.jpg 650w, https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/stein-eric-650-300x162.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px" /><p id="caption-attachment-70212" class="wp-caption-text">Eric Stein</p></div>
<h3>In the US presidential election, the polls have tightened over the past several weeks and market-implied betting probabilities have started to close.</h3>
<p>Eric Stein, Co-Director of Global Income at Eaton Vance Management notes: “At this point, however, I think Joe Biden should still be considered the frontrunner. Recent momentum for President Trump depends heavily on what happens with the economy and the coronavirus. Only a month ago, large majorities of potential US voters expressed fear about how much the pandemic seemed to be accelerating, which lowered the probability of Trump&#8217;s re-election. Now, with the number of new infections slowing somewhat in the US, Trump&#8217;s prospect of winning — implied by either the polls or the market — appears to be going up.”</p>
<p>He adds: “Much has been said about the economic impacts of President Trump getting re-elected, Biden winning but the Republicans keeping the Senate, or Biden winning with a clean Democratic sweep of Congress. Certainly, there would be a big impact on tax rates and regulatory policy depending on these outcomes.</p>
<p>“I think it&#8217;s also important geopolitically whether Trump or Biden wins. Clearly, the Trump administration has shifted the narrative on China — essentially the only bipartisan issue in Washington where everyone has been trying to out hawk each other.</p>
<p>&#8220;If Biden gets elected, I don&#8217;t expect him to go soft on China as Trump has claimed, but rather to be far more hawkish than he was as Vice President in the Obama administration.</p>
<p>“That being said, I anticipate that Biden&#8217;s approach would be different — far more multilateral with US allies in Asia, and with Europe more in the fold than it has been under President Trump.</p>
<p>“So I think the geopolitical ramifications of the US election should not underestimated and could even be more important than the impacts from a domestic tax and regulatory policy perspective,” Stein says.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_70212" style="width: 660px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-70212" class="size-full wp-image-70212" src="https://adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/stein-eric-650.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="350" srcset="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/stein-eric-650.jpg 650w, https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/stein-eric-650-300x162.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px" /><p id="caption-attachment-70212" class="wp-caption-text">Eric Stein</p></div>
<h3>In the US presidential election, the polls have tightened over the past several weeks and market-implied betting probabilities have started to close.</h3>
<p>Eric Stein, Co-Director of Global Income at Eaton Vance Management notes: “At this point, however, I think Joe Biden should still be considered the frontrunner. Recent momentum for President Trump depends heavily on what happens with the economy and the coronavirus. Only a month ago, large majorities of potential US voters expressed fear about how much the pandemic seemed to be accelerating, which lowered the probability of Trump&#8217;s re-election. Now, with the number of new infections slowing somewhat in the US, Trump&#8217;s prospect of winning — implied by either the polls or the market — appears to be going up.”</p>
<p>He adds: “Much has been said about the economic impacts of President Trump getting re-elected, Biden winning but the Republicans keeping the Senate, or Biden winning with a clean Democratic sweep of Congress. Certainly, there would be a big impact on tax rates and regulatory policy depending on these outcomes.</p>
<p>“I think it&#8217;s also important geopolitically whether Trump or Biden wins. Clearly, the Trump administration has shifted the narrative on China — essentially the only bipartisan issue in Washington where everyone has been trying to out hawk each other.</p>
<p>&#8220;If Biden gets elected, I don&#8217;t expect him to go soft on China as Trump has claimed, but rather to be far more hawkish than he was as Vice President in the Obama administration.</p>
<p>“That being said, I anticipate that Biden&#8217;s approach would be different — far more multilateral with US allies in Asia, and with Europe more in the fold than it has been under President Trump.</p>
<p>“So I think the geopolitical ramifications of the US election should not underestimated and could even be more important than the impacts from a domestic tax and regulatory policy perspective,” Stein says.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2020/09/geopolitical-ramifications-of-the-upcoming-us-election-should-not-be-underestimated/">Geopolitical ramifications of the upcoming US election should not be underestimated</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2020/09/geopolitical-ramifications-of-the-upcoming-us-election-should-not-be-underestimated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>