<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoiceDownsizing and net sale proceeds: Parton’s Case - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2023/11/downsizing-and-net-sale-proceeds-partons-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2023/11/downsizing-and-net-sale-proceeds-partons-case/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 21:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Downsizing and net sale proceeds: Parton’s Case</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2023/11/downsizing-and-net-sale-proceeds-partons-case/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2023/11/downsizing-and-net-sale-proceeds-partons-case/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 20:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[From the Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Hallinan]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.adviservoice.com.au/?p=92409</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_74504" style="width: 660px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-74504" class="size-full wp-image-74504" src="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hallinan-michael-650.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="350" srcset="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hallinan-michael-650.jpg 650w, https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hallinan-michael-650-300x162.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px" /><p id="caption-attachment-74504" class="wp-caption-text">Michael Hallinan</p></div>
<h2>A couple sold their home and the net proceeds were not entirely used for a new home:</h2>
<ul>
<li><span class="x_font-arial">The Tribunal held that any amount of the net sale proceeds not used to acquire the replacement home ceased to be the subject of special rules.</span></li>
<li><span class="x_font-arial">The used proceeds would be counted as an asset and while, for income means test purposes, the unused sale proceeds would be included in the pool of financial assets to which the normal deeming rates would apply.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">This case<sup>[1]</sup> illustrates the consequence where the net sale proceeds were not entirely applied in the application of the replacement home. Mr and Mrs Parton, rather like Bill and Wilma (see the article: &#8220;Downsizing and the Age Pension&#8221;<sup>[2]</sup>), sold their home and did not immediately acquire a replacement home. Once they acquired the replacement home, they did not use up all of the sale proceeds.  They intended that a portion of the net sale proceeds would be used in repairing and modifying their replacement home.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">The issue to be resolved was how the retained net sale proceeds affected their entitlement to the age pension.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">The Tribunal held that once they acquired their replacement home, any amount of the net sale proceeds which was not used to acquire the replacement home ceased to be subject to the special rules applying to the sale proceeds of the family home.  The used proceeds would be counted as an asset and while, for income means test purposes, the unused sale proceeds would be included in the pool of financial assets to which the normal deeming rates would apply.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">The Tribunal did note that if the Partons then applied the unused portion of the sale proceeds in the repair and modification of the replacement home, the amount used in this way would become part of the replacement home and therefore be disregarded for the purpose of the assets means test and cease to exist as a financial asset for the income means test.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">As the relevant events of the Parton’s situation occurred before 1 January 2023, the sale proceeds would only be excluded from the assets means test for 52 weeks and not 104 weeks.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">Additionally, the balance of the sale proceeds would form part of the ordinary pool of financial assets to which the 0.25% and 2.25% rates apply.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">Note: This article was prepared as at August 2023.  The article has not been updated in light of subsequent developments.</span></p>
<div class="x_layout x_fixed-width x_stack">
<div class="x_layout__inner">
<div class="x_column x_wide">
<p><em><strong><span class="x_font-arial">By </span></strong></em><span class="x_font-arial"><em><strong>Michael Hallinan, Executive Consultant – Self Managed Superannuation</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<h6><strong>Notes:</strong><br />
[1] <a href="https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-y/">https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-y/</a><br />
[2] <a href="https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-j/">https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-j/</a></h6>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_74504" style="width: 660px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img decoding="async" aria-describedby="caption-attachment-74504" class="size-full wp-image-74504" src="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hallinan-michael-650.jpg" alt="" width="650" height="350" srcset="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hallinan-michael-650.jpg 650w, https://www.adviservoice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/hallinan-michael-650-300x162.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px" /><p id="caption-attachment-74504" class="wp-caption-text">Michael Hallinan</p></div>
<h2>A couple sold their home and the net proceeds were not entirely used for a new home:</h2>
<ul>
<li><span class="x_font-arial">The Tribunal held that any amount of the net sale proceeds not used to acquire the replacement home ceased to be the subject of special rules.</span></li>
<li><span class="x_font-arial">The used proceeds would be counted as an asset and while, for income means test purposes, the unused sale proceeds would be included in the pool of financial assets to which the normal deeming rates would apply.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">This case<sup>[1]</sup> illustrates the consequence where the net sale proceeds were not entirely applied in the application of the replacement home. Mr and Mrs Parton, rather like Bill and Wilma (see the article: &#8220;Downsizing and the Age Pension&#8221;<sup>[2]</sup>), sold their home and did not immediately acquire a replacement home. Once they acquired the replacement home, they did not use up all of the sale proceeds.  They intended that a portion of the net sale proceeds would be used in repairing and modifying their replacement home.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">The issue to be resolved was how the retained net sale proceeds affected their entitlement to the age pension.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">The Tribunal held that once they acquired their replacement home, any amount of the net sale proceeds which was not used to acquire the replacement home ceased to be subject to the special rules applying to the sale proceeds of the family home.  The used proceeds would be counted as an asset and while, for income means test purposes, the unused sale proceeds would be included in the pool of financial assets to which the normal deeming rates would apply.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">The Tribunal did note that if the Partons then applied the unused portion of the sale proceeds in the repair and modification of the replacement home, the amount used in this way would become part of the replacement home and therefore be disregarded for the purpose of the assets means test and cease to exist as a financial asset for the income means test.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">As the relevant events of the Parton’s situation occurred before 1 January 2023, the sale proceeds would only be excluded from the assets means test for 52 weeks and not 104 weeks.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">Additionally, the balance of the sale proceeds would form part of the ordinary pool of financial assets to which the 0.25% and 2.25% rates apply.</span></p>
<p><span class="x_font-arial">Note: This article was prepared as at August 2023.  The article has not been updated in light of subsequent developments.</span></p>
<div class="x_layout x_fixed-width x_stack">
<div class="x_layout__inner">
<div class="x_column x_wide">
<p><em><strong><span class="x_font-arial">By </span></strong></em><span class="x_font-arial"><em><strong>Michael Hallinan, Executive Consultant – Self Managed Superannuation</strong></em><br />
</span></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<h6><strong>Notes:</strong><br />
[1] <a href="https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-y/">https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-y/</a><br />
[2] <a href="https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-j/">https://chstrategies.cmail20.com/t/r-l-tifkia-kucilyhhi-j/</a></h6>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2023/11/downsizing-and-net-sale-proceeds-partons-case/">Downsizing and net sale proceeds: Parton’s Case</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2023/11/downsizing-and-net-sale-proceeds-partons-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>