If we see a continued recovery in US housing, we’ll start to see a US construction-led recovery. Once that comes through, we’ll see employment recovery and that should drive a consumption-led recovery. This could very quickly see a positive spiral happening.

Europe is a little bit more challenged. The European financial crisis is still with us. It’s going to be a two to three year workout. Growth rates in Europe will be much slower over this period. But I think markets are in the process of discounting that.

Emerging markets are an extremely good long-term place for investors to target. They have a long way to grow. We will go through cycles of being worried about inflation, short-term slowdowns. But you are going to see China, India, Brazil and Africa deliver consistent economic growth of between 4% to 7% which will power GDP growth for the world over a period of time. I think that’s where the investment opportunities will lie, whether they are companies domiciled in those emerging markets which you want to play, or companies in developed markets, which sell to those emerging markets.

Why invest in global equities now?
I think the consumption recovery in emerging markets, the growth of the middle class in those markets, is something that will propel certain sectors and companies. For example, people there will increase their spending on personal items on personal care, on healthcare as their per capita income goes up.

We try to think of themes which would stay with us irrespective of the macroeconomic environment. So if you look at a theme like Smartphone penetration, that’s a theme that we can play across the globe by either investing in the phone manufacturers, the manufacturers of equipment who power the broadband networks, the telephone or the cell phone providers.

When I look at companies from a global perspective I try and think about where they’re actually selling.  What are the key drivers of their growth?  BHP Billiton is stock listed in developed markets.  It’s listed in Australia.  But its growth triangles are all in emerging markets.  From my perspective it’s an emerging market stock.  Infosys on the other hand is listed in India, but it sells all its goods and services to US and to Europe.  From my perspective, that’s a developed market stock.

My portfolio is only 15% weighted towards emerging markets, but over time as we see more national champions coming out of emerging markets and we see more Samsung-like companies coming out of Korea or Hyundai and Kia, I’d expect that weighting to go up to closer to 30% over the next five years.

What are the risks for global equities?
The main issue I see is high energy prices and high oil prices. They could very quickly stamp out the economic recovery that we’re seeing, as energy could be a huge tax on the consumer and on the world. 

I also think the European economic crisis has not yet been fully sorted and we could very quickly see things change for the worse. The issues with Greece, with Portugal, with Spain have not yet been fully sorted. It will take some time to be sorted. That’s a risk to globalisation.

Longer-term, what you’re seeing is a lot of money printing by central banks. This could lead to huge fiscal deficits, huge sovereign debts on an overall basis.  At some point in time you need to find the money to pay for all this sovereign debt and all the money printing that central banks are doing. That could be tremendously inflationary for the global economy and that’s a risk that investors need to keep in mind, because ultimately when you have inflation it is always the savers who end up paying for it. 

This document is issued by FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009, AFSL No. 409340 (“Fidelity Australia”).  Fidelity Australia is a member of the FIL Limited group of companies commonly known as Fidelity Worldwide Investment. This document is intended for use by advisers and wholesale investors. Retail investors should not rely on any information in this document without first seeking advice from their financial adviser. This document has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.  You should consider these matters before acting on the information.  You also should consider the Product Disclosure Statements (“PDS”) for respective Fidelity products before making a decision whether to acquire or hold the product.  The relevant PDS can be obtained by contacting Fidelity Australia on 1800 119 270 or by downloading from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. The issuer of Fidelity’s managed investment schemes is FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited ABN 33 148 059 009. Details about Fidelity Australia’s provision of financial services to retail clients are set out in our Financial Services Guide, a copy of which can be downloaded from our website at www.fidelity.com.au. © 2012 FIL Responsible Entity (Australia) Limited. Fidelity, Fidelity Worldwide Investment and the Fidelity Worldwide Investment logo and F symbol are trademarks of FIL Limited.

The post What’s next for global equities? appeared first on AdviserVoice.

From a macro perspective, there is no doubt that monetary tightening, higher commodity prices and electricity shortages are slowing China’s GDP growth. Credit tightening is having a serious impact on small and medium-sized companies, which will inevitably lead to more non-performing loans in the banking sector.

Automobile sales are weak due to government measures, housing sales are dropping and a weak domestic stock market points towards tightening liquidity. There is no question that China’s stimulus programs of 2009-10 led to some significant misallocation of capital and probably brought forward some commodity demand.

However, to my mind, all this suggests an engineered cyclical slowdown in the pace of growth, designed to control inflationary pressures, rather than signposts on a path to structural decline as some of the China bears would have you believe.

First, a few words on growth. HSBC recently published an interesting time line that put the development of various emerging markets into historical context by placing them on a timeline of US economic development.1 On this basis, China stands about where the US was in 1941. (Die-hard commodity bulls will notice that India is where the US was in 1882.)

However, what is even more interesting is that China is achieving in a decade what it took the US 50 years to achieve.
This rapid pace of innovation and productivity growth was apparent during my trip. For example, the Chinese have worked hard to increase the domestic supply of some resources and to bring down costs. In commodities like aluminium, bauxite, nickel and stainless steel, Chinese companies are innovating and are, in some cases, more competitive than western companies. In manufacturing, the significant size of the domestic market again gives Chinese companies a significant scale advantage, allowing them to invest more in R&D.

Property and consumption
Much has been written about the supposed property bubble in China. My view is slightly more nuanced than some of the recent commentary. It is true that property prices are towards the top end of their rising trend in real terms and the house-price-to-income ratio is high. The amount of floor space under construction has soared in the past decade and it is argued that prices need to drop to clear supply.

However, the strong counter-argument is that the total housing stock in China is still short of demand (according to some estimates, by almost 80 million units). Most of the supply has been at the top end and has been absorbed by investors paying cash (given a lack of other domestic investment alternatives in an era of negative real interest rates), leaving a real shortage in the middle and at the bottom end of the market. It is as if there has been massive over-building in Knightsbridge in London but too little construction outside the capital. The government, through its social housing initiative, is trying to set this imbalance right and, over time, this will support commodity demand.

Domestic consumption also remains a positive driver of demand for some commodities. Copper looks to be a beneficiary, thanks to its importance in, for example, air conditioning and car manufacturing. China remains committed to innovation and renewable technologies. New electric cars, for example, use up to three times as much copper as traditional ones. Cars are largely bought for cash in China and, with fewer than 60 cars per 1,000 people (compared with 750 in the US and an average of 150 in the world), the growth road stretches a long way into the future.

So, for me, the main insights from my recent trip were firstly that China remains on a structural growth path, even as it tries to navigate a near-term engineered cyclical slow-down to combat inflation.

The second was that innovation and productivity remain strong and, while rising labour inflation is a worry, increased GDP per capita will drive the economy more towards consumption-driven growth.

Thirdly, as China moves towards becoming a consumption-driven economy (as opposed to the investment-driven growth that it has experienced over the past 10 years), the outlook for consumption commodities (energy, platinum, potash, oil) will be superior to those driven primarily by investment spending (steel, aluminium, iron ore, etc).These changes will play to the strengths of stock pickers over the next 10 years.

The post Is China headed for a hard landing? appeared first on AdviserVoice.