<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoicetax policy Archives - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/tag/tax-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/tag/tax-policy/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 21:30:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>Deferred date for new tax treatments for managed investment trusts</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/06/deferred-date-for-new-tax-treatments-for-managed-investment-trusts/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/06/deferred-date-for-new-tax-treatments-for-managed-investment-trusts/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[managed investment trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=9830</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p><a name="Content"></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;">Last year, the government announced a new tax system for managed investment trusts (MITs) that will reduce complexity, increase certainty and minimise compliance costs for MITs and their investors.  In April, a further announcement was made to d</span></span><span style="line-height: normal; font-size: small;">efer the start date of the new laws from 1 July 2011 to 1 July 2012.  The government also announced two minor changes to the previously announced measure to facilitate the entry of MITs into the new tax system.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span> The new tax system will be largely based on recommendations arising from the Board of Taxation review of the taxation arrangements applying to MITs.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span> Key aspects of the new tax system will be:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></span></span></p>
<ul>
<li>an elective &#8216;attribution&#8217; system of taxation that will replace the present entitlement system and provide that investors are taxed only on the income that the trustee allocates to them on a fair and reasonable basis, consistent with their entitlements under the trust deed or the trust&#8217;s constituent documents</li>
<li>implementation of rules dealing with &#8216;under&#8217; and &#8216;over&#8217; distributions that are within a 5% cap, so that trustees are not required to reissue statements and investors are not required to revisit tax returns removal of double taxation that arises in certain circumstances</li>
<li>abolition of Division 6B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 which relates to corporate unit trusts.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><a href="http://www.ato.gov.au/wp-content/00243087.htm">Click for more information about the taxation of MITs</a>.<br />
</span></span></p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a name="Content"></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;">Last year, the government announced a new tax system for managed investment trusts (MITs) that will reduce complexity, increase certainty and minimise compliance costs for MITs and their investors.  In April, a further announcement was made to d</span></span><span style="line-height: normal; font-size: small;">efer the start date of the new laws from 1 July 2011 to 1 July 2012.  The government also announced two minor changes to the previously announced measure to facilitate the entry of MITs into the new tax system.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span> The new tax system will be largely based on recommendations arising from the Board of Taxation review of the taxation arrangements applying to MITs.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span> Key aspects of the new tax system will be:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></span></span></p>
<ul>
<li>an elective &#8216;attribution&#8217; system of taxation that will replace the present entitlement system and provide that investors are taxed only on the income that the trustee allocates to them on a fair and reasonable basis, consistent with their entitlements under the trust deed or the trust&#8217;s constituent documents</li>
<li>implementation of rules dealing with &#8216;under&#8217; and &#8216;over&#8217; distributions that are within a 5% cap, so that trustees are not required to reissue statements and investors are not required to revisit tax returns removal of double taxation that arises in certain circumstances</li>
<li>abolition of Division 6B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 which relates to corporate unit trusts.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="line-height: normal;"><a href="http://www.ato.gov.au/wp-content/00243087.htm">Click for more information about the taxation of MITs</a>.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/06/deferred-date-for-new-tax-treatments-for-managed-investment-trusts/">Deferred date for new tax treatments for managed investment trusts</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/06/deferred-date-for-new-tax-treatments-for-managed-investment-trusts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>SPAA says Budget fails to adequately address excess contributions problem</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/spaa-says-budget-fails-to-adequately-address-excess-contributions-problem/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/spaa-says-budget-fails-to-adequately-address-excess-contributions-problem/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fund Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-managed superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax policy]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=8246</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">SPAA believes measures do not go far enough and will deny middle Australians the opportunity for saving for a comfortable retirement</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">The Self-Managed Super Fund Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) has today acknowledged that the Federal Budget has begun to address the excess superannuation contributions problem which results in high penalty taxes for Australians saving for retirement, but believes the measures announced fall way short of a sensible, working solution to rectify the problem.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Under the measures, the Government will provide eligible individuals with the option to have excess concessional contributions taken out of their superannuation fund and assessed as income at their marginal rate of tax, rather than incurring excess contributions tax. This measure will apply where an individual has made excess concessional contributions of up to $10,000 in a particular year and will only be for breaches in 2011-12 or later years, and only the first time the breach occurs.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div>“This is a positive step aimed at reducing instances of inadvertent concessional cap breaches but this measure provides no relief to individuals who may have incurred excess contributions tax in 2007/08, 2008/09, 2009/10 and 2010/11 financial years,” said Andrea Slattery, SPAA CEO. “It will also provide no relief for individuals who inadvertently breach their non-concessional cap either before or after 1 July, 2011,” she said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“SPAA believes this measure will result in more middle Australians being caught by inadvertent errors as they try to make legitimate moves to save for a comfortable, self funded retirement.”</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">SPAA noted that the superannuation contribution caps will remain at their current levels despite repeated calls by SPAA and others for the caps to be restored to their pre 1 July 2009 levels.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“This is disappointing as the 50% reduction in the concessional contribution cap which was announced in the 2009 Federal Budget continues to deny many thousands of Australian, who typically have a greater financial capacity to save for their own retirement later in life, the opportunity to do so,” said Mrs Slattery.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Mrs Slattery said SPAA supported the Government move to allow for the $25,000 in additional concessional contributions to apply to the indexed $25,000 concessional cap for the over 50s from July 2012, but was disappointed the $500,000 threshold would not be indexed.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“This measure is a step in the right direction, but the fact that the $500,000 threshold is unindexed means that each year, fewer middle Australians will qualify for access to the higher annual superannuation caps needed to save for a comfortable retirement, and is a short-sighted move,” Ms Slattery said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">In other Budget measures, SPAA welcomes the announcement that the Government will reduce the pension drawdown to 75% of the minimum amount for account based, allocated and market linked pensions for 2011/12.</div>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">SPAA believes measures do not go far enough and will deny middle Australians the opportunity for saving for a comfortable retirement</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">The Self-Managed Super Fund Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) has today acknowledged that the Federal Budget has begun to address the excess superannuation contributions problem which results in high penalty taxes for Australians saving for retirement, but believes the measures announced fall way short of a sensible, working solution to rectify the problem.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Under the measures, the Government will provide eligible individuals with the option to have excess concessional contributions taken out of their superannuation fund and assessed as income at their marginal rate of tax, rather than incurring excess contributions tax. This measure will apply where an individual has made excess concessional contributions of up to $10,000 in a particular year and will only be for breaches in 2011-12 or later years, and only the first time the breach occurs.</div>
<div id="_mcePaste"><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div>“This is a positive step aimed at reducing instances of inadvertent concessional cap breaches but this measure provides no relief to individuals who may have incurred excess contributions tax in 2007/08, 2008/09, 2009/10 and 2010/11 financial years,” said Andrea Slattery, SPAA CEO. “It will also provide no relief for individuals who inadvertently breach their non-concessional cap either before or after 1 July, 2011,” she said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“SPAA believes this measure will result in more middle Australians being caught by inadvertent errors as they try to make legitimate moves to save for a comfortable, self funded retirement.”</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">SPAA noted that the superannuation contribution caps will remain at their current levels despite repeated calls by SPAA and others for the caps to be restored to their pre 1 July 2009 levels.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“This is disappointing as the 50% reduction in the concessional contribution cap which was announced in the 2009 Federal Budget continues to deny many thousands of Australian, who typically have a greater financial capacity to save for their own retirement later in life, the opportunity to do so,” said Mrs Slattery.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Mrs Slattery said SPAA supported the Government move to allow for the $25,000 in additional concessional contributions to apply to the indexed $25,000 concessional cap for the over 50s from July 2012, but was disappointed the $500,000 threshold would not be indexed.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“This measure is a step in the right direction, but the fact that the $500,000 threshold is unindexed means that each year, fewer middle Australians will qualify for access to the higher annual superannuation caps needed to save for a comfortable retirement, and is a short-sighted move,” Ms Slattery said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">In other Budget measures, SPAA welcomes the announcement that the Government will reduce the pension drawdown to 75% of the minimum amount for account based, allocated and market linked pensions for 2011/12.</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/spaa-says-budget-fails-to-adequately-address-excess-contributions-problem/">SPAA says Budget fails to adequately address excess contributions problem</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/spaa-says-budget-fails-to-adequately-address-excess-contributions-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>