<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
    <channel>
        <title>AdviserVoicetax reform Archives - AdviserVoice</title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/tag/tax-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/tag/tax-reform/</link>
        <description>Financial planner information &#38; financial planner education/CPD - AdviserVoice</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 20:30:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
                    <item>
                <title>FPA: Measures to fix excess contributions falls short</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 04:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-managed superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=8307</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>FPA  propose  further  reforms  to  super  contributions  to  secure  Australia’s  long  term  retirement  savings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Last night’s Federal Budget announcement allowing excess superannuation  contributions to be refunded back to the individuals reflects the ongoing  advocacy efforts of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) but represents a  lost opportunity to fix a problem facing many Australians.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“While this  reform is expected to reduce the number of occasions where the concessional  contribution caps are exceeded and individuals penalised, the measure falls well  short of delivering a solution for a very serious problem,” FPA CEO Mark Rantall  said.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
&#8220;We believe the government could have taken advantage of the strong  economic position to embark on a more ambitious tax reform program and whilst  the concessional contributions amendments are welcome, there needs to be a  substantial rethink of how we engage Australians in contributing to a stronger,  long term retirement income position.”<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The FPA has called on the Federal  Government to remove the 46.5 per cent excess contributions tax penalty for  non-concessional contribution and:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Refund excess non-concessional  contributions back to the taxpayer</li>
<li>Provide taxpayer with warning and  impose no monetary penalty if it is taxpayers first break of the  non-concessional cap</li>
<li>Impose a monetary penalty (admin fee) on the  taxpayer if this is the second/third break of the non-concessional  cap</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Nor does the FPA support the introduction of a $500,000 account  balance eligibility threshold for concessional contributions. Rather, the FPA  has called for:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>The concessional contributions cap for people aged 50  and over to at least remain at $50,000 but indexed with inflation</li>
<li>Removal of the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) from the concessional contribution  limit</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
From 1 July 2011, individuals who breach the concessional  contributions cap by up to $10,000 can request that these excess contributions  be refunded to them. This refund will only apply for first time breaches of the  concessional caps. In effect, individuals will be able to take excess  concessional contributions out of their superannuation fund and have it assessed  at their marginal rate of tax, rather than incurring a potentially higher rate  of excess contributions tax. However, what is not clear is whether individuals  who have breached the cap before this measure commences will be  eligible.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The Government plans to complement the other reforms including  the increase in the concessional caps for those over 50 (with superannuation  balances under $500,000) from 1 July 2012; the gradual increase in the SG rate  to 12 per cent; and a new super contribution of up to $500 for low income  earners.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“The FPA looks forward to continuing to work with the Federal  Government and Treasury to ensure we achieve the most equitable outcome for both  the financial planning profession and the retirement savings of all  Australians,” Mr Rantall said.</p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FPA  propose  further  reforms  to  super  contributions  to  secure  Australia’s  long  term  retirement  savings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Last night’s Federal Budget announcement allowing excess superannuation  contributions to be refunded back to the individuals reflects the ongoing  advocacy efforts of the Financial Planning Association (FPA) but represents a  lost opportunity to fix a problem facing many Australians.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“While this  reform is expected to reduce the number of occasions where the concessional  contribution caps are exceeded and individuals penalised, the measure falls well  short of delivering a solution for a very serious problem,” FPA CEO Mark Rantall  said.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
&#8220;We believe the government could have taken advantage of the strong  economic position to embark on a more ambitious tax reform program and whilst  the concessional contributions amendments are welcome, there needs to be a  substantial rethink of how we engage Australians in contributing to a stronger,  long term retirement income position.”<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The FPA has called on the Federal  Government to remove the 46.5 per cent excess contributions tax penalty for  non-concessional contribution and:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>Refund excess non-concessional  contributions back to the taxpayer</li>
<li>Provide taxpayer with warning and  impose no monetary penalty if it is taxpayers first break of the  non-concessional cap</li>
<li>Impose a monetary penalty (admin fee) on the  taxpayer if this is the second/third break of the non-concessional  cap</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
Nor does the FPA support the introduction of a $500,000 account  balance eligibility threshold for concessional contributions. Rather, the FPA  has called for:<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></p>
<ul>
<li>The concessional contributions cap for people aged 50  and over to at least remain at $50,000 but indexed with inflation</li>
<li>Removal of the Superannuation Guarantee (SG) from the concessional contribution  limit</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
From 1 July 2011, individuals who breach the concessional  contributions cap by up to $10,000 can request that these excess contributions  be refunded to them. This refund will only apply for first time breaches of the  concessional caps. In effect, individuals will be able to take excess  concessional contributions out of their superannuation fund and have it assessed  at their marginal rate of tax, rather than incurring a potentially higher rate  of excess contributions tax. However, what is not clear is whether individuals  who have breached the cap before this measure commences will be  eligible.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
The Government plans to complement the other reforms including  the increase in the concessional caps for those over 50 (with superannuation  balances under $500,000) from 1 July 2012; the gradual increase in the SG rate  to 12 per cent; and a new super contribution of up to $500 for low income  earners.<br />
<span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span><br />
“The FPA looks forward to continuing to work with the Federal  Government and Treasury to ensure we achieve the most equitable outcome for both  the financial planning profession and the retirement savings of all  Australians,” Mr Rantall said.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/">FPA: Measures to fix excess contributions falls short</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/fpa-measures-to-fix-excess-contributions-falls-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>Actuaries disappointed longevity risk ignored again in 2011 Federal Budget</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annuities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fund Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-managed superannuation funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[superannuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=8251</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">The Institute of Actuaries of Australia (the Institute) has today said it was disappointed the pressing issue of longevity risk was largely ignored in the 2011 Federal Budget.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>The Institute has been urging the government to develop longevity risk policies, including removing barriers to the development of a new generation annuities market, to meet the growing challenges of Australia&#8217;s ageing population.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Recognising many retirees superannuation will not meet their retirement needs, Institute chief executive Melinda Howes it was time the government took decisive action on this issue.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“We were pleased the Federal Government followed our recommendation and allowed older Australians to boost their standard of living in retirement by working part-time without jeopardising their pension income. From 1 July, age pensioners will be able to earn up to $250 per fortnight before their pension will be impacted by the means test.”</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Ms Howes said although this positive change was made as part of the Government&#8217;s workplace participation initiatives, the issue of longevity risk continues to be side-lined when a number of solutions are available. These include allowing development of flexible &#8220;new generation&#8221; annuities which protect against the risk of outliving your retirement savings and the market risk of losing superannuation capital in retirement.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“Retirees need access to products that reduce the two major risks they face, market and longevity risk. Innovative annuity products are ideally suited to meet these objectives however a number of legislative impediments are limiting their development,” she said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">In its pre-Budget submission, the Institute urged the government amend the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act Regulation 106 as it is unnecessarily prescriptive and as a result is hampering innovation. The unfavourable treatment of annuities under aged care and Centrelink rules should also be reversed and the tax rules on deferred annuities should be changed so that, if taken out in the drawdown phase, the product is regarded as a pension (rather than a non-pension) for tax purposes.</div>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="_mcePaste">The Institute of Actuaries of Australia (the Institute) has today said it was disappointed the pressing issue of longevity risk was largely ignored in the 2011 Federal Budget.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>The Institute has been urging the government to develop longevity risk policies, including removing barriers to the development of a new generation annuities market, to meet the growing challenges of Australia&#8217;s ageing population.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Recognising many retirees superannuation will not meet their retirement needs, Institute chief executive Melinda Howes it was time the government took decisive action on this issue.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“We were pleased the Federal Government followed our recommendation and allowed older Australians to boost their standard of living in retirement by working part-time without jeopardising their pension income. From 1 July, age pensioners will be able to earn up to $250 per fortnight before their pension will be impacted by the means test.”</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;"><br />
</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">Ms Howes said although this positive change was made as part of the Government&#8217;s workplace participation initiatives, the issue of longevity risk continues to be side-lined when a number of solutions are available. These include allowing development of flexible &#8220;new generation&#8221; annuities which protect against the risk of outliving your retirement savings and the market risk of losing superannuation capital in retirement.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">“Retirees need access to products that reduce the two major risks they face, market and longevity risk. Innovative annuity products are ideally suited to meet these objectives however a number of legislative impediments are limiting their development,” she said.</div>
<div><span style="color: #ffffff;">x</span></div>
<div id="_mcePaste">In its pre-Budget submission, the Institute urged the government amend the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act Regulation 106 as it is unnecessarily prescriptive and as a result is hampering innovation. The unfavourable treatment of annuities under aged care and Centrelink rules should also be reversed and the tax rules on deferred annuities should be changed so that, if taken out in the drawdown phase, the product is regarded as a pension (rather than a non-pension) for tax purposes.</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/">Actuaries disappointed longevity risk ignored again in 2011 Federal Budget</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/05/actuaries-disappointed-longevity-risk-ignored-again-in-2011-federal-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
                    <item>
                <title>AFA: FOFA reforms include new education standards</title>
                <link>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/04/afa-fofa-reforms-include-new-education-standards/</link>
                <comments>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/04/afa-fofa-reforms-include-new-education-standards/#respond</comments>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 22:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
                <dc:creator>
                                    </dc:creator>
                		<category><![CDATA[Industry Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adviser education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFA FOFA advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FoFA reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax reform]]></category>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://adviservoice.com.au/?p=7206</guid>
                                    <description><![CDATA[<p>This week the Government and ASIC have made two key announcements concerning the future of advice.</p>
<ol>
<li>Increasing education standards for new and existing advisers</li>
<li>Financial advisers and the scope taxation advice</li>
</ol>
<p>Together with FoFA these proposed changes will impact the landscape of advice in this country. The AFA is well placed to ensure that these changes are appropriate and will work to ensure that the implementation is as effective as possible.</p>
<h3><strong>RG 153 : Advisers and Education RG 153</strong></h3>
<div>ASIC proposes amending the assessment and professional development framework for financial advisers by requiring:&nbsp;</p>
<ol>
<li>all new and existing financial advisers who provide Tier 1 financial advice to pass a Financial Services Competency Certification exam to ensure they have the requisite competencies to perform their role. (‘Entry Stage’)</li>
<li>all new financial advisers following Entry Stage to be supervised by a supervisor (who has at least 5 years experience in the industry) for a minimum period of 1 year full time or equivalent;</li>
<li>all financial advisers to undertake a Knowledge Update Review every three years on changes to laws, market issues and new products; and ongoing continuing professional development requirements.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byHeadline/11-75MR%20ASIC%20proposes%20new%20training%20and%20assessment%20framework%20for%20financial%20advisers?opendocument">Click here to read RG 153</a></p>
<h3><strong>Future Regulation of Financial Planners Providing Tax Advice</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>The scope of services that can be provided by financial planners is determined according to the type of registration held.</li>
<li>A financial planner can provide general factual tax information (not tax advice).</li>
<li>If a financial planner has an additional form of registration, they can provide tax advice within the context of providing financial advice. The scope of tax advice that will be permissible within this category will depend upon the competencies that are required.</li>
<li>Tax agents registered under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 provide full tax agent services including preparing or lodging returns or representing a taxpayer in their dealings with the Commissioner of Taxation.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/049.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=brs&amp;Year=&amp;DocType=">Click here to read the Minister&#8217;s speech</a></span></strong></p>
]]></description>
                                            <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the Government and ASIC have made two key announcements concerning the future of advice.</p>
<ol>
<li>Increasing education standards for new and existing advisers</li>
<li>Financial advisers and the scope taxation advice</li>
</ol>
<p>Together with FoFA these proposed changes will impact the landscape of advice in this country. The AFA is well placed to ensure that these changes are appropriate and will work to ensure that the implementation is as effective as possible.</p>
<h3><strong>RG 153 : Advisers and Education RG 153</strong></h3>
<div>ASIC proposes amending the assessment and professional development framework for financial advisers by requiring:&nbsp;</p>
<ol>
<li>all new and existing financial advisers who provide Tier 1 financial advice to pass a Financial Services Competency Certification exam to ensure they have the requisite competencies to perform their role. (‘Entry Stage’)</li>
<li>all new financial advisers following Entry Stage to be supervised by a supervisor (who has at least 5 years experience in the industry) for a minimum period of 1 year full time or equivalent;</li>
<li>all financial advisers to undertake a Knowledge Update Review every three years on changes to laws, market issues and new products; and ongoing continuing professional development requirements.</li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byHeadline/11-75MR%20ASIC%20proposes%20new%20training%20and%20assessment%20framework%20for%20financial%20advisers?opendocument">Click here to read RG 153</a></p>
<h3><strong>Future Regulation of Financial Planners Providing Tax Advice</strong></h3>
<ol>
<li>The scope of services that can be provided by financial planners is determined according to the type of registration held.</li>
<li>A financial planner can provide general factual tax information (not tax advice).</li>
<li>If a financial planner has an additional form of registration, they can provide tax advice within the context of providing financial advice. The scope of tax advice that will be permissible within this category will depend upon the competencies that are required.</li>
<li>Tax agents registered under the Tax Agent Services Act 2009 provide full tax agent services including preparing or lodging returns or representing a taxpayer in their dealings with the Commissioner of Taxation.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><a href="http://ministers.treasury.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=pressreleases/2011/049.htm&amp;pageID=003&amp;min=brs&amp;Year=&amp;DocType=">Click here to read the Minister&#8217;s speech</a></span></strong></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/04/afa-fofa-reforms-include-new-education-standards/">AFA: FOFA reforms include new education standards</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.adviservoice.com.au">AdviserVoice</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
                                    <wfw:commentRss>https://www.adviservoice.com.au/2011/04/afa-fofa-reforms-include-new-education-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
                <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>                            </item>
            </channel>
</rss>