AdviserVoice

Investment

Do you use a platform? You could be breaching the Best Interests Duty

Claire Wivell Plater

Claire Wivell Plater

Recent guidance from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) confirms in no uncertain terms that the Best Interests Duty applies just as much, if not more, to platform recommendations as it does to investments.

“We discovered the guidance around platform recommendations while reviewing RG148 on platforms,” says Claire Wivell Plater, Managing Director of The Fold Legal (The Fold). “It outlines significant precautions advisers must take when selecting and recommending a platform.”

Ms Wivell Plater says that the most important thing to consider is whether being on the platform is in the client’s best interests.

“An adviser’s Statement of Advice (SoA) needs to canvass the variety of implications the platform may have on the client,” she says. “It should also contain enough information to enable the client to assess whether to use or switch to a platform.”

Ms Wivell Plater says when advisers recommend a platform, their SoAs will now need to explain the following:

“What is interesting is that RG148, which you would expect to be all about the platforms themselves, actually contains guidance for advisers who use platforms,” Ms Wivell Plater says. “It underscores the need for licensees and financial planners to be right across all the regulatory guides at all times.”

Click here to read more about the implications of RG148 for advisers and licensees at the Fold’s blog – Frankology.

Latest Articles

Exit mobile version