AdviserVoice

Thought Leadership

Will advisers really be worse off if we take incentives off our products?

Jim Stackpool

Jim Stackpool

The Financial Services Council’s Life Insurance Conference held before Easter has brought the ‘incentive elephant’ back into the room.

On the day, former member of the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority John Trowbridge highlighted the structural problems of incentive-based practices within the insurance industry.

For many, his comments have re-ignited anxiety in the belief that ‘Mum and Dad’ Australians will be worse off if all commissions were removed from all financial products.

While Trowbridge’s comments have sparked furious debate, his strong words are backed by Certainty Advisers, who are also calling for structural change to the industry.

The Certainty Advice Group surveyed their nationwide pool of financial advisers, with the following reactions:

Founder of Certainty Advice Group Jim Stackpool observes that the Trowbridge’s ‘incentive elephant’ is not unique to the insurance industry. “What’s different about financial services industries is the speed of converging changes caused by technology, regulatory reform and consumers demanding more value for money,” he says.

“Mr Trowbridge’s comments should be taken as one of the many opportunities for advisers as to how advice will be delivered in the future.

“It’s the confidence and sense of security that great advisers have always provided their advice clients. Shifting their remuneration models to better reflect the value they add is becoming more and more a necessity.”

Latest Articles

Exit mobile version