AdviserVoice

Economic Update

The constrained medium term return outlook

Key points

Introduction

While the high inflation of the 1970s and early 1980s was bad for investment returns at the time, it left a legacy of very high investment yields which helped set the scene for high investment returns through the 1980s and 1990s. Back in the early 1980s the RBA’s “cash rate” was averaging around 14%, 3 year bank term deposit rates were around 12%, 10 year bond yields were around 13.5%, commercial and residential property yields were running around 8-9% and dividend yields on shares were around 6.5% in Australia and 5% globally. Such yields meant investments were already providing very high cash income. So for assets like property or shares only modest capital growth was necessary to give good returns. As a result, back then the medium term (5-10 year) return potential from investing was solid. In fact most assets had spectacular returns in the 1980s and 1990s. Australian superannuation funds saw returns average 14.1% pa in nominal terms and 9.4% pa in real terms between 1982 and 1999 (after taxes and fees).

 

 

But since the early 1980s the starting point in terms of investment yields has been moving progressively lower, resulting in slowing 10 year average nominal and real returns for superannuation funds as seen the chart above. Today the RBA cash rate is just 1.5%, 3 year bank term deposit rates are just 2.6-3%, 10 year bond yields are just 1.9%, gross residential property yields are around 3% and while dividend yields are still around 6% for Australian shares (with franking credits) they are around 2.5% for global shares. This note looks at the medium term return potential from major assets and the implications for investors.

Potential return drivers

In getting a handle on potential medium term returns from an asset class the key is its starting point valuation. For example, if current yields – say bond yields and dividend yields – are lower than “normal” then this will likely constrain returns relative to the past. Investment returns have two components; capital growth, and yield (or income). The yield is the most secure component and generally speaking, when you start your investment the higher it is the better. So our approach to assessing medium term return potential is to start with current yields for each asset class and apply simple and consistent assumptions regarding capital growth. We prefer to avoid a reliance on forecasting and to keep the analysis as simple as possible. Complicated adjustments just lead to compounding forecasting errors.

 

 

 

 

Projections for medium term returns

Return projections using this approach are shown in the next table. The second column shows each asset’s current income yield, the third shows their 5-10 year growth potential, and the final column their total return potential. Note that:

Combining the return projections for each asset indicates that the implied return for a diversified growth mix of assets has now fallen to 6.9% pa and is shown in the final row.

 

 

Megatrends influencing the growth outlook

Several themes are allowed for in our projections: slower growth in household debt; the backlash against economic rationalist policies of globalisation, deregulation and small government; rising geopolitical tensions; aging and slowing populations; low commodity prices; technological innovation & automation; the Asian ascendancy & China’s growing middle class; rising environmental awareness; & the energy revolution. Most of these are constraining nominal growth and hence investor returns. However, technological innovation is positive for profits and some of these point to inflation bottoming.

Key things to note

Several things are worth noting from these projections.

 

 

Implications for investors

There are several implications for investors:

Dr Shane Oliver Head of Investment Strategy and Chief Economist AMP Capital

[1] Adjustments can be made for: dividend payout ratios (but history shows retained earnings often don’t lead to higher returns so the dividend yield is the best guide); the potential for PEs to move to some equilibrium level (but this relies on forecasting the equilibrium PE which can be difficult and in any case extreme dividend yields send strong valuation signals anyway); and adjusting the earnings/capital growth assumption for some assessment regarding profit margins (but again this is hard to get right). So we prefer to avoid forecasting these things.

Latest Articles

Exit mobile version