Victor Verberk

Robeco has launched its Sustainable Investing Open Access Initiative. This means that Robeco is opening up its Sustainable Investing Intellectual Property. As a first step of this Open Access initiative, clients and a group of academics will gain free access via a portal to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) scores of companies Robeco has generated using its proprietary SDG framework.

Robeco started developing its SDG Framework in 2017. The framework allows Robeco to quantify an investible company’s contribution to the SDGs. Data quality is one of the biggest challenges in sustainable investing. Robeco is convinced that the industry should work together to improve data and define standards. With the SI Open Access Initiative, Robeco aims to make a significant contribution to this.

Robeco’s commitment to a more sustainable world also means opening up its intellectual property to a broader audience to help clients make better informed sustainable decisions. Robeco actively seeks for feedback on the data, and is in an ongoing dialogue with its stakeholders, including academics, clients and SI experts. As a result, Robeco expects that this initiative will further enhance the robustness of the data and our methodology. All of this with the aim to contribute and be part of the move towards a more sustainable world. At a later stage, Robeco will also make other SI data and IP available to a broader set of stakeholders.

The SDG framework is used for many of Robeco’s client portfolios. These include some of the world’s biggest asset owners like UBS Global Wealth Management, BBVA AM and pensioenfonds ING, who are all keen supporters of Robeco’s SI Open Access initiative.

Victor Verberk, CIO Fixed Income and Sustainability: “This initiative is right in line with our firm belief in a data and research-driven approach. We were among the first asset managers to construct an effective framework for mapping and measuring SDG contributions that can be applied across investment portfolios. Traditionally asset managers tend to protect intellectual property and use it to add value to their proprietary investment processes. Yet the massive challenges our planet is facing require a different approach. We need to join forces to address these challenges properly. By opening up our SDG data to a broader audience we aim to contribute to improving quality and standards setting across the industry.”

Carola van Lamoen, Head of Sustainable Investing: “We consider this is a landmark move which will bring the sustainable investing industry a step further. Granting clients and academics access to our SDG data and methodology is only the first step. With SDG data clients can measure progress over time against sustainable objectives, steer on exposure to SDGs, and report on them. Robeco is a research-driven investor. We base our investment decisions on empirical research and believe that this also applies to sustainable investing. Furthermore, by publishing our SDG scores we aim to enable academics to develop new insights. We therefore invite them to actively share their feedback on our SDG data and methodology.”

The post Robeco opens up its Sustainable Investing IP with launch of new SI initiative appeared first on AdviserVoice.

Victor Verberk

The Robeco SDG Credit Income Fund (AUD Hedged) (“Fund”) has received a recommended rating from independent research house, Lonsec.

Robeco launched the Fund – which aims to contribute to realising the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (“SDG”) – for Australian investors in November 2020. It feeds into the Luxembourg-domiciled strategy launched in May 2018, and has since attracted USD 1.2 billion in assets under management globally as of 31 March 2021.

The strategy is managed by Robeco’s global credits team including the CIO of fixed income and sustainability, Victor Verberk, and portfolio managers Reinout Schapers and Evert Giesen are jointly responsible for the management of the Fund.

The sustainable investing team, led by Carola van Lamoen, is responsible for the framework, data and assessment of names relative to the SDG’s.

In assessing the Fund, the report said: “Robeco has a strong pedigree in sustainable investing and the SDG/impact framework is seen as robust and well-developed with specialist resourcing.

“Overall ESG integration across the investment process for the Fund was strong and demonstrated a leading position relative to peers in this sector.”

Robeco Australia head, Stephen Dennis, said: “Receiving a ‘recommended’ rating from Lonsec is a strong endorsement of the Fund and increases its appeal to financial advisers. With our expertise in sustainable investing and credits, Robeco is well placed to meet the demand in the market for quality sustainable credit funds.”

The Robeco SDG Credit Income Fund (AUD Hedged) is an actively managed global credit strategy that invests in opportunities across different segments of the credit market, ranging from investment grade to emerging markets credits, to high yield.

It aims to provide a monthly income distribution and achieve an attractive yield currently about four per cent per annum, while managing downside risk and mapping the impact of the portfolio’s contributions to the SDG’s.

The recommended rating from Lonsec for Robeco SDG Credit Income Fund (AUD Hedged) sits alongside the recommended rating from research consultancy, Zenith Investment Partners.

The post Lonsec awards recommended rating to Robeco SDG Credit Income Fund (AUD Hedged) appeared first on AdviserVoice.

Victor Verberk

In light of the massive gap between markets and fundamentals, we approached this Credit Quarterly Outlook with the question: do fundamentals still matter?

Sander Bus, Co-head of the Robeco Credit team, says, “Longer term, we have no doubt that fundamentals still matter for markets but, for the last several months, the central bank put has overwhelmed everything else. Quick and decisive action by governments and central banks helped to restore a large part of the initial losses, by removing the systemic risk in the market. The risk of a banking crisis or even a Eurozone sovereign crisis is now arguably lower than before Covid-19, due to the easing of banking regulation, the introduction of quasi Eurobonds, relaxed rules for state support and several other supportive actions by authorities”.

We recognise this dynamic and feel comfortable that at least senior bank and Eurozone sovereign spreads are under policy control and unlikely to move dramatically wider. The same holds for higher-quality corporate bonds that are eligible for ECB buying and that can benefit from fiscal support in the form of guaranteed lending, furlough schemes and other measures.

According to Bus, “one of the few segments of the market where fundamentals still matter today, is the weaker end of the high yield market. Here you find many vulnerable companies that will not survive an extended period of weak demand”.

Limited inflationary impact

Victor Verberk, Co-head of the Robeco Credit team, sees limited inflationary consequences from the policy response. “We do not expect much inflationary impact from the massive increase in money supply engineered by fiscal authorities and central banks, at least in the next few years. The disinflationary forces stemming from the disruption to demand will simply be too strong. Secular forces such as aging and technological developments do not point to galloping inflation, either. Moreover, academic research suggests that the inflationary impact of deglobalization should not be overestimated”.

The odds of an inflationary uptick on a horizon beyond the coming years do seem more pronounced, though. Nevertheless, this would require the increase in money supply to be sustained and eventually associated with much stronger consumer and business spending, as ‘more money starts to chase fewer goods’.

Inflation will probably follow the rules of the ‘ketchup theory’, says Verberk: “At first, nothing comes out of the bottle, but as you keep on shaking and the ketchup starts to flow, you end up with more than you wanted.”

Fading recovery momentum

So, where are we now? After the initial shock, macro data in Q3 surprised to the upside compared to very downbeat expectations. This has helped risk markets. But the momentum of the recovery is clearly fading now and the positive surprises have ended. With winter approaching in the northern hemisphere, we are already seeing more infections across much of Europe and local lockdowns that will hurt the economic recovery.

For many corporates, the economic downturn means weaker balance sheets and negative cashflow. “Let’s not forget that Covid arrived after the longest US economic expansion ever recorded by the NBER,” says Robeco Credit Strategist Jamie Stuttard. “We were already warning of an economic downturn in the Outlook a year ago, not knowing that Covid-19 would be the trigger.”

“Weaknesses were already prevalent in corporate credit, such as stretched balance sheets, debt-funded M&A and poor documentation. Massive government intervention in the private sector and liquidity injections helped to extend the cycle but it is likely (and healthy!) that we go through a proper bear market. A bear market is the best medicine to clean up the house; it gets rid of the zombie firms, repairs balance sheets and strengthens documentation. Only when that process is finalized are the markets ready for a brand new multi-year credit bull market,” says Stuttard.

Stretched valuations

“For the market as a whole we judge valuations as being stretched,” according to Verberk. “Spread levels are at or below the long-term average for all segments of the market. The tight spreads can be explained by the strong technicals but do not compensate for the current fundamental environment.”

He adds that the market looks even more expensive if adjusted for quality. “The weight of BBB in the US investment grade market has steadily gone up from 35% in 2008 to over 50% today, within 0.5% of its all-time record.”

Market cycle  |  Mapping our view on market segments

Source: Robeco, September 2020

For high yield, it is easier to see spreads going wider from here, explains Bus, since this market only benefits indirectly from the central bank put. “The Fed limits individual high yield bond buying to companies that were investment grade before late March 2020, a sum total of just 8 tickers.”

The rally may have run its course

“We now have the view that the rally has run its course,” says Bus. “It is difficult to see further material spread tightening from here. We lower our beta for investment grade to 1. For high yield, where we were already below 1, we keep it there.”

We are convinced that there will be opportunities to add or reduce risk in the coming months, not only from a top-down perspective but also in individual issuers or sectors. There is still a lot of volatility in Covid-sensitive sectors, which from time to time offer good value.

The post Robeco credit quarterly outlook: Q4 2020 appeared first on AdviserVoice.

Victor Verberk

Robeco has taken an important next step in its sustainable investing approach with the decision to exclude investments in thermal coal, oil sands and Arctic drilling from all its mutual funds.

Robeco has decided to exclude investments in thermal coal as it is by far the highest carbon-emitting source of energy in the global fuel mix. Oil sands are among the most carbon-intensive means of crude oil production, and Arctic drilling poses higher risks of spills compared to conventional oil and gas exploration. It also has potentially irreversible impacts on the sensitive Arctic ecosystem.

Companies that derive 25% or more of their revenue from thermal coal or oil sands, or 10% or more from Arctic drilling, will be barred from investment portfolios. This step expands the thermal coal exclusion policy that already applied to Robeco’s most sustainable and impact strategies, and now also encompasses companies engaged in oil sands and Arctic drilling. The exclusion applies to all of Robeco’s mutual funds, excluding client-specific funds and mandates but including sub-advised funds.

Robeco is convinced that actively engaging with companies it invests in is in the long-term interest of the company, its clients and broader society, but that engagement with these particular companies will not lead to significant change. Robeco therefore prefers to concentrate its efforts on sectors and companies where engagement will be more effective. A number of recent successes from Robeco’s engagement team underpin this belief.

The process of excluding fossil fuel companies will be completed by the end of Q4 2020.

Victor Verberk, CIO Fixed Income and Sustainability at Robeco: “Investing is not only about creating wealth but also about contributing to wellbeing, and we are fully convinced that if you focus on sustainability, you’re going to be a better asset manager. Our move to exclude investments in fossil fuels from our funds is a further step in our efforts to lower the carbon footprint of our investments, transitioning to a lower carbon economy. As global leader in sustainable investing we are committed to the Paris agreement, which aims to limit the rise in global temperatures to well below 2 °C. This will require substantial reductions in global greenhouse gas emissions over the next few decades.”

The post Robeco extends exclusion of investments in fossil fuels to all its funds appeared first on AdviserVoice.

Victor Verberk

Spreads have moved from historically narrow levels straight to recessionary wides. It is time to buy.

• COVID-19 is causing an economic shock comparable to the global financial crisis
• Authorities scramble to respond with fiscal and monetary stimulus
• In just 4 weeks, valuations have collapsed to levels seen only four times in the last 80 years.

What a difference one quarter can make. “In December we observed an equity market bubble continuing to inflate and a sustained late-cycle search for yield in credit,” says Victor Verberk, Co-head of the Robeco Credit Team. “Today we face a certain and severe global recession, an equity market crash and spreads that have moved from the historical tights straight to recessionary wides.”

As he puts it in Robeco’s latest Credit Quarterly Outlook: “The world now has a common enemy. We have to join forces to beat the virus and avoid deep economic downturn. Authorities will provide fiscal and monetary support for the private sector. Governments and banks will need to work side by side to contain the fallout.”

The short term will be economically challenging, with market pain and many market participants scrambling for cash and withdrawals. But Verberk says the Robeco Credits team is of the view that markets will try to look forward, through the stimulus and beyond stabilization in COVID-19 infections.

A shock with deep secular and cyclical roots

The longest economic expansion has ended abruptly. The end of the expansion itself is not a surprise; but the nature of the exogenous shock, its speed and the magnitude of the slowdown is. “History is being made. But while COVID-19 is the proximate trigger, we firmly believe current events are not just about the virus. They have deep secular and cyclical roots.”

Sander Bus, Co-head of the Robeco Credit Team, explains how we got to this stage: “We discussed the debt super-cycle in a number of previous Credit Quarterly Outlooks. Many global imbalances, such as the rise in Chinese private sector debt from just USD 4.5 trillion before the global financial crisis to USD 30 trillion today, have been building for years. At minus USD 11 trillion, the US net international investment position is five times more extreme than it was before the global financial crisis. Social inequality has risen to levels not seen since the 1920s.”

A build-up of imbalances emerged in this expansion, the result of 11 years of risk accumulation. “Central bank policy, which was too easy at times (e.g. 2014-17), fuelled an equity bubble and deterioration in lending standards. Many open economies, such as Germany and Japan, had already weakened before 2020, hurt by mercantilism and trade tensions.”

This unusual combination of market excesses and real economic fragility left both economies and markets vulnerable to a negative shock. No one knows ahead of time what the exogenous shocks and proximate triggers for crashes would be. If they were known, they would be priced in and there would be no crash.

“There is no doubt about the proximate trigger this time,” Bus says. “A global recession is now inevitable and could be as severe as during the global financial crisis, when US GDP fell nearly 4% year on year. Credit spreads are already compensating for a deep recession.”

In this bear market, everything is happening at a faster speed – including the policy response from monetary and fiscal authorities. Jamie Stuttard, Robeco Credit Strategist, believes that authorities have learned from the 2008 experience and are evidently prepared to go further and faster. “We will see a transfer of risk from the private sector to the public sector at the expense of huge fiscal deficits, funded by central banks amid increased asset purchase programs. Such public sector risk sharing is exactly what stopped the 2008 crisis, and is needed again.”

He points out that the costs will be huge, though, and the long-term question is: who will pay the bill? “Will the costs fall on the public sector and translate into a special ‘corona tax’ in coming years or will the private sector bear the burden?”

Stuttard expects that this will probably differ by country, depending on the inclination of governments to accept or prevent corporate failures amid the most vulnerable credits.

Starting up again after shutdown

It is still uncertain when the global economy will be restarted. COVID-19 is still spreading rapidly and we have not yet seen the peak. As long as the end of corona is not in sight, markets will probably remain extremely volatile, Verberk says. “That said, markets will try to look through all the misery and will slowly price the right COVID-19 premium.”

In short, the fundamentals are clearly weak. “A deep recession and lots of uncertainty will be with us for some time. But it is evident that we are in the phase of fear, panic and loathing. Regarding policies to soften the blow, expect fiscal support of over USD 1 trillion in each major economic region,” according to Verberk.

On positioning, he points out: “We are known not only for our conservative investment style, but also for our value-based, contrarian approach. Our view is that one should trim risk when the skies are clear, and buy risk when the storm has begun and markets panic. And, we believe that we have now reached the moment to reduce the underweight exposure to high yield markets and to implement a long position in investment grade. This is the big sell-off that we have been waiting for – for years. We recommend that clients with a strategic horizon adopt a contrarian stance, as well, and that they add risk.”

Verberk acknowledges that this approach may seem counterintuitive. “The near-term looks set to confirm a deep recession and severe market pain in some quarters. We appreciate that it does feel like the worst time to add risk, but that is usually the best time to do so.”

“It is the end of one cycle as we know it. But that sows the seeds for a new one.”

The post Credit outlook: ‘The common enemy’ appeared first on AdviserVoice.

Sander Bus

The US economy is growing above its potential. Job openings are now exceeding the number of unemployed workers. In this environment it is no surprise that the Fed is continuing to hike. Tighter dollar liquidity is putting pressure on non-US issuers that rely on dollar funding. At the same time the ECB is still reluctant to tighten monetary policy more aggressively.

Divergence between global bond markets has increased in the last three months with US spreads tightening further, while Europe and especially emerging markets have underperformed. We do not believe that the negative correlation between the US and international credit markets can continue indefinitely and would argue that US spreads should widen. We reaffirm our belief – made in our last outlook for Q3 – that the tightest spreads in this cycle are now behind us. And although there is no reason to expect a full- blown crash anytime soon, spreads are likely to widen gradually.

Market technicals are still weak. The fact that the Fed is on a hiking path and the ECB’s quantitative easing is drawing to a close are not helping fixed income as an asset class. The huge supply of US Treasuries could crowd out other financial assets and US investment grade (IG) is right in the line of fire. It makes you wonder who will be the marginal buyer of credit and fixed income in general in such an environment. US insurance companies and pension funds could be potential candidates as they may have an incentive to increase fixed income allocations now that coverage ratios have improved. However, overall we would still conclude that technicals are negative for our asset class.

As always, our outlook is divided into three sections: fundamentals, valuations and technicals. But first, here’s where we think the main credit markets are in the cycle.

Figure 1 | The Market Cycle: mapping our view on market segments

Source: Robeco, Morgan Stanley, September 2018

Where are we in the credit cycle?

We continue to see indications that the cycle is maturing and still feel that spreads probably reached their tightest levels last January. Of course, It is notoriously difficult to predict the exact point at which the cycle will turn and the depth of the ensuing bear market, but since we believe spreads will grind wider we have placed the dots in the bear market phase. This does not mean that there are not still opportunities, however. In this sort of environment, we can expect pockets of the market to occasionally reprice quite aggressively and if such situations result in buying opportunities we will not hesitate to take advantage of these. US high yield has held up well compared to other bond segments, but we think that here too spreads will eventually follow those in other parts of the market and start to widen.

Fundamentals: Economic slack is a thing of the past

In this chapter we look at economic fundamentals, such as economic growth, inflation expectations, debt levels and dollar liquidity.

We are living in interesting times. A number of long-term trends seem to have reached an inflection point. Ten years on from the Global Financial Crisis, there is no longer any slack in the economy. Labor markets have recovered and monetary stimulus is being reversed. Another long-term trend also seems to be coming to an end. Globalization. This has helped to keep inflation low and economic growth high. It was good for corporate profits and financial markets but blue-collar workers suffered. With Trump at the helm this is changing. He is determined to bring the supply chain ‘home’ by increasing trade barriers. The long-term effects will probably be higher inflation (through higher wages) and lower global growth. The short-term effects of lower tax rates, deregulation and a pick-up in capex have propelled risky assets but we do not believe this will be a positive development for markets in the longer term.

US: steaming ahead – but how long can it go it alone?

The US economy is growing well above potential, which heightens the risk of inflation. But as yet figures have remained rather muted, with core CPI ex-shelter still at just 1.3%. However, wages are now definitely moving higher so it will just be a matter of time until this is reflected in the overall figures. And we should not overlook the extent to which inflation is a lagging variable: it could be with us before we are fully aware of its presence.

US investment grade leverage has increased rapidly. In the past, leverage has always peaked in a recession when EBITDA levels have dipped. So in the current environment, it is striking that leverage is now already above previous peaks, while EBITDA continues to grow at a healthy pace.

M&A related debt issuance is one of the main culprits for the heightened leverage. Rating agencies have been quite relaxed about accepting leverage that is ‘temporarily’ at an elevated level. The risk is that this will trigger downgrades if companies do not deliver on their promises to reduce leverage should we move into a more adverse economic environment.

Earnings growth is solid but headwinds will increase going forward, with margins likely to shrink as wage pressure creeps in and input costs rise. But as EBITDA margins are at a high level, we do not see a corporate crisis as one of the major risks.

The US consumer is in a strong position as reflected by consumer sentiment indices. Strong labor markets and wage growth support the consumer. Income growth in the US stands at 5% due to wage growth of around 3% in addition to the increase in the number of jobs.

Europe: political risk overshadows economic fundamentals

Political risk in Europe is still elevated. The political situation in Italy is still reason for concern and could have a significant destabilizing effect, especially on other peripheral markets. The ECB wants to avoid a flare up of a sovereign debt crisis at any price.

Business sentiment in Europe is still positive but industrial production growth has come down. Despite the strong labor market data, consumer spending has continued to slow, but should be supported by wage growth, which is now starting to gain momentum. Core Inflation has so far remained range bound and although it could trend higher on the back of higher wages, the ECB is not under huge pressure to hike interest rates too quickly or aggressively.

At company level, profits are still solid so from a credit perspective there is not too much to worry about in terms of corporate health although it seems unlikely growth will accelerate. European corporates have also been much more conservative in using leverage than their US counterparts, which should make them more resilient in the event of a market turn down.

Emerging Markets: dollar squeeze and China slowdown

Emerging markets are clearly suffering from a reduction in dollar liquidity, with countries that depend on foreign funding (Turkey, Argentina) really feeling the pain. Several have been forced to hike rates in order to stem weakness in their own currencies. The collateral damage if this trend continues is severe economic slowdown.

We cannot talk about emerging markets without spending some time on China. One indicator which highlights the weaker growth in the Chinese economy is the demand for industrial metals. These indices have been declining since the second quarter. They reflect the lower demand for metals in China, which is accompanying a sharp decline in infrastructure spending.

The policy options still open to the Chinese authorities to stem the weakness are also limited. Monetary loosening is no real solution as this would weaken the currency too much at a time when the Fed is hiking. A weak renminbi is referred to as the ‘nuclear option’ as it could spark a widespread currency crisis across Asia. Stimulating credit growth is not an attractive alternative either as China is trying to clamp down on excessive leverage, especially via shadow banking, in the corporate and local government space. The one remaining option could be fiscal stimulus in the form of tax reform. All in all, it will be quite tough for China to avoid a prolonged period of slower growth.

Valuation: Better value to be found in European credit

In this section we look at valuations – which market segments look rich and which offer room for spread tightening?

Spreads in Europe have widened slightly further in the last three months but are still not cheap in historical terms. US credit has continued to outperform and can now be classified as outright expensive. We have also seen wider spreads in emerging markets although this weakness has mainly been in a selective group of high yield countries.

While we conclude that the market as a whole is still not cheap, it is interesting to look at ratios and make some comparisons. If we divide US IG spreads by European IG spreads we see that the ratio has dropped from 1.7 to 1.0 since the start of the year and a very similar shift has occurred in high yield spreads. On a cross-currency-hedged basis we can conclude that European credit is now cheap relative to US dollar credit. In the case of high yield, it is also important to realize that it’s not just a case of a better spread in Europe; the quality of debt is much better too. The average credit rating in the European high yield market is BB, whereas the US market is dominated by single Bs. So we maintain our overweight in Europe, even though the position has not played out so far this year.

Risk on in US High Yield

Since the start of the year CCC have outperformed significantly in the US high yield market. This is clear evidence of the risk on sentiment in the US. CCC also outperformed as this category is perceived to be less sensitive to interest rate increases than higher rated credits. However, at current valuation levels, CCC credit spreads are not offering sufficient compensation for an average default scenario in the next five years and so we avoid this category as much as we can.

Nor are we convinced that the worst is behind us for emerging markets. Spreads are still not wide enough across the board, but we are prepared to selectively take positions in bonds that have undergone significant repricing. For example, we have recently picked up a few high-quality Turkish and Chinese credits that got dragged down by the broader Turkish market turmoil.

For a long time now, we have had a preference for investment grade financials. This is still the case as we still find relatively attractive investment opportunities in this segment. Within financials we will move some exposure to more senior parts of the capital structure as there are some attractively priced senior preferred and senior non-preferred new issues.

Technicals: ongoing headwinds for credit

In this chapter we discuss technical factors, such as global reduction in US dollar supply, increased Treasury issuance and increasing hedging costs.

Although corporate profitability is still strong we believe that the dominant factor for credit will be weaker market technicals. A reduction in central bank liquidity is still the key driver for markets and Fed policy does not only result in higher rates, it also leads to lower dollar excess reserves. The impact of this is mainly felt by oversees US dollar borrowers. It is therefore not surprising that the first cracks have started to appear in the offshore dollar market for some high-risk dollar borrowers (i.e. Turkey and Argentina).

A second technical that has the potential to hurt credit markets is the huge supply of US Treasuries being used to finance the country’s fiscal deficits. Buyers will be found for these issues – they will be priced to ensure that this is the case and other fixed income categories could be crowded out as a result. A somewhat mitigating factor is the relatively mild supply of corporate debt.

Higher short-term dollar rates are also continuing to have an impact on hedging costs. Cross- currency-rate differentials determine the costs of hedging and these have clearly expanded. The logical effect will be a lower demand for US fixed income, at least until repricing causes these to revert to more acceptable levels.

In previous outlooks we have extensively discussed the end of quantitative easing in Europe. This event is well flagged but still important for the market. The ECB’s CSPP and PSPP programs are now in their final stages. In the foreseeable future, the biggest net buyer of European credit will limit it’s purchasing to just reinvesting coupons and redemptions. European IG spreads have already widened significantly from their tightest levels in early 2018 in anticipation of this.

Ballooning BBB universe

Another market technical we discussed is the massive growth of the BBB universe in both Europe and in the US. Since 2010, This segment of the market has more than tripled in Europe and more than doubled in the US. In itself, this is not a major issue. But if the tide turns in the market and rating agencies are forced to take action, the relatively small high yield market could be inundated with a wave of ‘fallen angels’ as companies lose their IG status. Given the still solid outlook for corporate profitability, this is not a theme that should upset markets in the short run, but in a weaker market environment it could make matters worse.

As a final point we would like to discuss interest rate coverage. According to this metric, credit quality still looks sound although coverage levels have slipped somewhat due to higher debt levels. Rising EBITDA is a mainstay for interest-rate coverage ratios as are the declining average coupon levels. However, we have now reached a point where new issues no longer print at a lower coupon and, although this is a gradual process, we should realize that the tailwind offered by refinancing into lower coupons is behind us. For companies that use leveraged loans as a main funding source (an increasing number of companies are loan-only financed) the coverage ratio will decline much more rapidly in an environment of rising Libor rates. This adds an additional vulnerability to the loan market, which is already rife with aggressive financing structures and over leveraged businesses.

Our conclusion is unchanged from our previous quarterly outlook. Technicals continue to look vulnerable.

Conclusion & positioning: caution in world of shrinking liquidity

How will we be positioning our credit portfolios in the coming quarter?

Cautious positioning despite improved valuations

Valuations have become slightly better in Europe and emerging markets, but not enough to justify a more aggressive positioning. Caution is warranted in a world of shrinking liquidity. In the new era of tighter monetary policy, we are probably going to see more instances of aggressive de-risking in pockets of the market. This can offer opportunities in situations where repricing has caused markets or individual issues to overshoot. We will be on the look out for these opportunities as they arise and will be proactive in taking advantage of them. At the same time, we will also make sure that our portfolios are defensively positioned. We expect most of these opportunities to arise in the emerging markets space.

Euro credit is cheaper in relative terms

Hedging costs for US assets are high and this makes Euro denominated assets look cheap on a relative basis. Our preference for Europe extends to both the investment grade and high yield segments.

Quality financials look attractive

In Europe, we see still see value in financials, although we are very selective in terms of the quality of the issuers in which we invest. Within this space we are increasingly seeing value outside the most junior parts of the capital structure, so we have move some investments into senior preferred and senior non-preferred debt.

Conclusion

All in all, these are quite challenging times for credit markets. Tighter global monetary policy, diverging growth patterns in the major economic regions, shrinking dollar liquidity and increasing competition from US Treasuries could crowd out credit. However, in general, fundamentals remain solid, especially for corporates, so there is no cause for undue panic and a scenario of gradually rising spreads offers opportunities for us to find value in those pockets of the market that reprice to more attractive levels.

Guests

We would like to thank the guests who contributed to this new quarterly outlook with their valuable presentations and discussions. The views of Torsten Slok (Deutsche Bank), Shobhit Gupta (Barclays), Guy Stear (Societe Generale) and Rikkert Scholten (Robeco) have been taken into account in establishing our credit views.

By Sander Bus, Co-head Credit team, and Victor Verberk, Co-head Credit team

The post Credit Quarterly Outlook Q4 2018 – Crowding out credit appeared first on AdviserVoice.