The beauty of a benchmark unaware approach


Investors in Australian equities are often reminded of the concentration risk of the Australian market, with the Big Four banks and resources companies accounting for a large proportion of the market.

If we look at the composition of the S&P/ASX 20 Index as at 1 January 2018, 9 companies in the financial category account for 54% of the market capitalisation. This group of 9 includes household names such as Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac, ANZ, National Australia Bank, Macquarie Group, AMP and IAG.



For investors looking at offshore opportunities in the United States for example, the concentration theme plays out in a slightly different way. As you can see from the charts below, technology companies replace banks. As at 31 December 2017, the top 4 stocks in the S&P 500 were all technology companies and accounted for 11% of market capitalisation. The top 10 stocks included 5 technology companies and accounted for 21%.



In addition to concentration risk, investors also need to consider the issue of valuations. For some time now, good quality companies listed on the ASX and global stock markets have been trading at full valuation. The Big Four Australian Banks are often cited as being fully valued, however looking at Nathan Bell’s article from mid-2017 (Just 2 ASX stocks pass the Benjamin Graham filter) there are a number of listed companies that don’t pass the Ben Graham hurdle.

While you may be able to look at a particular index and construct a diversified portfolio that mitigates concentration risk, in the current environment, it is likely to be an expensive exercise where you ultimately end up holding a portfolio of fully valued assets.

Using a benchmark unaware approach

A benchmark unaware portfolio construction approach allows an investment manager to use their research expertise to actively identify the best, risk-adjusted opportunities regardless of the composition of any theoretical or actual index.

As a long-term value manager, the investment team at Peters MacGregor have the flexibility to apply our investment philosophy and approach without the restriction of referencing a particular benchmark.

The benefit for investors is that we only invest in relatively inexpensive quality companies that satisfy our ‘margin of safety’ criteria. We value each prospective business using a discounted free cash flow model and only invest when the share price is at least 20% below this assessed value. This forms the basis of our ‘margin of safety’ and is critical in protecting capital, minimising the chance of permanent losses and achieving high returns.

In our view, price is what you pay and value is what you receive. Over time, we’ve seen that a company’s share price will trend toward its true intrinsic value. Accordingly, our investments in world class businesses have two powerful factors working simultaneously: the value of the business is growing, while the share price is playing catch up to this value.

The beauty of a benchmark unaware approach is identifying and then owning shares in well managed companies, which are often not household names, growing their market share and delivering great results. Examples from our portfolio include Fairfax India and Discovery Communications.

At the end of the day, a commitment to benchmark unaware portfolio construction is about discipline. The discipline to: actively research companies, understand the value proposition and invest for the long-term. By moving beyond the short-term factors, as well as the emotion not economic and investment fundamentals, that often dictate the price of listed companies, we have successfully constructed a diversified portfolio of world-class businesses operating in major centres around the globe.

By Alex Haynes, Head of Distribution

Disclosure: Peters MacGregor Capital Management Limited holds a financial interest in Discovery Communications and Fairfax India through various mandates where it acts as investment manager.

You must be logged in to post or view comments.