Lonsec releases Australian and Global Equity Responsible Investment sector review
Lonsec’s annual Review of Responsible Investment Funds covered seven Australian equity and three global equity funds. Lonsec awarded its premier ‘Highly Recommended’ rating to two Australian Equity Funds – BT Wholesale Ethical Share Fund and the ING Wholesale Sustainable Investment Australian Shares Trust.
Observations on the Responsible Investment Sector
While it was a fairly unremarkable year in terms of product development, there were a number of significant team movements impacting on the sector. ‘Offerings from AMP Capital, Australian Ethical and Challenger all experienced significant personnel change,’ said Steve Sweeney, Lonsec’s Senior Investment Analyst responsible for reviewing the sector.
The lack of new entrants highlights the Responsible Investment sector’s continuing adjustment to subdued post credit crunch appetite for equity products. “There are a few exceptions (e.g. emerging market funds) but generally this trend is consistent with product development across most equities categories as fund managers continue to consolidate product lines,” said Sweeney.
Sweeney also attributes the lack of new Responsible Investment product development in some part to the failure of last year’s UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen to produce a meaningful outcome on achieving global emission reduction targets.
“Responsible Investment proponents were hopeful that a positive agreement committing economies to material emissions reduction would significantly progress the climate change agenda boosting the sector with some positive regulatory developments for key industries and companies,” said Sweeney.
Despite the lack of product growth, Lonsec observed an increased integration of ESG (assessment of environment, social and governance practices) into the mainstream company research process.
Sweeney noted that this trend has not been exclusive to funds in the traditional ethical or SRI sector but across other sectors including Australian equities, global equities, Asian and emerging market funds.
Although this trend is blurring the lines between the Responsible Investment sector and mainstream equity funds, Sweeney commented that there still remains “considerable grounds of distinction between ethical and sustainable or ESG style funds, including philosophical approach, that are likely of material interest to investors in these funds”.
Lonsec noted that while the sector’s Australian equity peer universe is modest (7 funds) there has been a wide variance in performance for the past 12 months and that this highlights that it is not a ‘one size fits all’ investment approach.
‘It’s important to recognise the structure of these funds can have a significant performance impact either through restricting the investment universe (e.g. no exposure to resources) or introducing increased volatility compared to mainstream large cap Australian equity funds due to greater exposure to smaller companies” said Sweeney.



