Life insurance gap beginning to close in Australia


New report from Rice Warner reveals increasing levels of personal insurance

Australia’s life insurance gap has reduced over the last six years, according to a new report from Rice Warner Actuaries.

As at June 2010, the overall level of underinsurance is $669 bn to meet the subsistence needs of families and dependants after death, which compares with $1,000 bn in 2005 on a like for like basis – a reduction of 33 per cent over the six years.

On an income replacement basis, the level of life underinsurance is $3,073 bn. Meanwhile, for total and permanent disability (TPD), the level of underinsurance sits at $7,182 bn and income protection underinsurance at $437 bn.

Michael Rice, Managing Director and Head of Strategy of Rice Warner Actuaries, attributes this shift to significant demographic, financial and life insurance market changes over the past six years and in particular, an increased focus on personal financial risks post-global financial crisis.

“Increased levels of personal insurance have been driven by an increase of default cover within superannuation, a greater focus on risk insurance by financial advisers and superannuation fund trustees as well as the growing direct life insurance market,” said Mr. Rice.

However, while the report points to a welcome development in the face of Australia’s continuing underinsurance problem, Mr. Rice warns we’re not out of the woods yet.
“While the market is now providing a substantial proportion of subsistence life insurance cover, this is still only half the amount of cover required to ensure that family members and dependents can maintain their standard of living after the death of a parent or partner,” explained Mr. Rice.
“Apart from individual detriment, underinsurance also comes at a substantial cost to the government. Currently the total cost to the government of life underinsurance across Australia is calculated to be $140 million per year as publically-funded social security benefits fill the gap. Meanwhile the situation regarding disability underinsurance is even more serious, costing the government nearly 9 times this amount!”
Mr. Rice believes there are things the government could do in the short term to remove glaring distortions and inequalities in the market in order solve this ever-present problem.
“The underinsurance issue would benefit from the government considering the removal of stamp duty from all life, total and permanent disability (TPD) and income protection policies; removal of GST on TPD and income protection products sold by General Insurers; equalization of the tax treatment of risk insurance inside and outside superannuation; and implementation of the proposed ‘scaled advice’ model with a particular focus on risk insurance.
“While the report proves the issue of underinsurance is still a significant one for the financial services industry and the government in Australia, it also reveals a positive step in the right direction.”


You must be logged in to post or view comments.